<rss
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"
><channel>
        <title>Christian Daily International | India</title>
        <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/india</link>
        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
        
        <copyright>Christian Daily International © 2026</copyright>
        <language>en</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 01:32:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="https://www.christiandaily.com/india?format=xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <atom:link href="https://www.christiandaily.com/india" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
        <generator>Xiaoman</generator>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[‘AI cannot pray for us’: Indian AI specialist urges pastors to own their sermons]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-cannot-pray-for-us-indian-ai-specialist-urges-pastors-to-own-their-sermons</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-cannot-pray-for-us-indian-ai-specialist-urges-pastors-to-own-their-sermons</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/54/5467.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[artificial intelligence, preaching, bible, sermon, pulpit, robot]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ iStock / selimaksan ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ An Indian AI specialist says AI should be used as a tool in ministry and never as a substitute for prayer, study or pastoral care. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Pastors who use artificial intelligence to prepare sermons and Bible studies must take full ownership of what they preach, an Indian AI specialist told church leaders. He also urged them never to enter personal or pastoral information into public AI tools.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Pastors who use artificial intelligence to prepare sermons and Bible studies must take full ownership of what they preach, an Indian AI specialist told church leaders. He also urged them never to enter personal or pastoral information into public AI tools.
The specialist, who works with AI in the corporate sector, spoke Oct. 16 at an online national webinar hosted by the Theological Commission of the Evangelical Fellowship of India. The event was titled "AI, Human Dignity and the Future of the Church." His presentation was titled "Artificial Intelligence: Its Impact and Its Use in Research."
He set out where generative AI can help churches, from sermon outlines to translation and administration. He also named areas where it should not be used and described a method for using AI in biblical research without handing over the work of interpretation.
The webinar also featured Indian theologian Canon Dr. Vinay Samuel, who argued in a theological paper that AI cannot become conscious like humans.
What remains human
The specialist opened with a question he said church leaders must face. "If AI can write a sermon, translate a Bible lesson or answer theological questions, what remains uniquely human in ministry?" he asked.
He said some people now turn to AI pastors and AI counselors, and many teenagers have AI "friends." Even when the software reminds users it is not human, he said, people remain attached to it. If church members, young people and children are turning to AI for everything, ministry leaders must ask how to reach them, he said.
His answer was that love, shepherding the church, serving, discernment and bearing witness to Christ remain human tasks. "These cannot be replicated by machine," he said.
He explained in plain terms how the technology works. He described AI as a toolbox and generative AI as a drafting tool. Large language models, he said, are writers trained on patterns that produce text by predicting the next word in a sentence.
"We feel it is working as if like a human, but actually it is just predicting the next token in a sentence," he said. He added that the results can still be very powerful.
The preacher owns the message
The specialist listed areas where AI can help ministry. These include sermon outlines, illustrations and Bible cross-references; study guides and devotionals; Christian education materials; and church administration such as meeting minutes and event planning. AI can also help translate resources into local languages and summarize long documents, he said.
But he drew a firm line around preaching. AI may help prepare study questions, illustrations and drafts, he said, but the pastor or preacher must own the message.
"You cannot say that AI has given me this message," he said.
Prayer, study, theological judgment and care for a congregation cannot be delegated, he said. "AI cannot pray for us," he said, adding that God expects believers to study his word themselves.
He said pastors should use AI for structure and let the biblical text govern the message. When asking AI for a sermon outline, he said, the request should specify the passage, audience, purpose, length and context. It should also ask the tool to flag any application that goes beyond the text.
Four risks
The specialist named four risks he said the church in India must actively manage.
The first is false authority. AI can produce fabricated Bible quotations and invented sources, a problem known as "hallucination," he said. Christians must make sure their authority comes from Scripture, not from fabricated material.
The second is borrowed work and bias, including plagiarism and one-sided interpretation. He said sources must be attributed and perspectives compared, especially when material is published.
The third is false identity. AI can impersonate people and create convincing deepfakes, he said, so users must confirm where information comes from.
The fourth is lost trust and presence. Congregations should not come to see their leaders' work as machine-made or their care as shallow, he said. "We have to protect people and keep human contact."
Keeping personal data out
He repeatedly warned participants never to share personal information about themselves or others with public AI tools. That includes what people confide in pastoral conversations, he said, as well as member records, health and financial details and identifiable stories.
He said churches holding children's information must be careful once India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act takes effect. Under the law, he said, such data may be kept only with the consent of parents or legal guardians.
In his view, information entered into public AI systems can later surface in responses to other users, though without the user's name. He said researchers should not put unreleased work into such tools for the same reason.
Tests before publishing
On translation, he said churches can draft a message in simple language and translate it with AI. But a fluent speaker of the local language must review it before use, he said, because AI misses nuances only a native speaker will catch.
He proposed five tests drawn from Christian discernment: truth, love, wisdom, stewardship and accountability. Before AI-generated content reaches people, he said, someone must check whether it is true, whether Scripture is quoted correctly and whether copyright, privacy and dignity are respected.
The final test is responsibility, he said: whether a named person can defend and approve what was produced. "A responsible person approves the facts, wordings and release," he said.
'Start with the passage'
In the second part of his presentation, the specialist turned to biblical research. He said AI should help believers explore, examine and express, but never work in isolation.
AI tools should be used alongside Bible study platforms such as Logos, Accordance, STEP Bible and Bible Gateway, he said, as well as commentaries, Bible dictionaries and concordances. AI should assist biblical research, he said, but not replace Scripture-centered interpretation, scholarly verification, prayer or pastoral discernment.
"We have to start with the passage, not with the prompt," he said.
He described a sequence: read the whole passage in context and observe repeated words, contrasts and commands. Then name the interpretive question, use AI to map options and identify sources, and verify the results against the Bible text, language tools and reliable scholarship. The final step is to shape teaching for the congregation.
"Prayerful reading and responsible interpretation remain human responsibilities," he said.
He showed sample requests to AI. For Mark 4:35-41, where Jesus calms the storm, he asked the tool to separate direct observations from interpretation, identify at least two plausible readings and list questions to check in commentaries. The request also told the tool not to invent citations.
For Romans 9:6-24, he asked AI to map major interpretive approaches and distinguish scholarly consensus from disputed claims. He said users must check whether the authors, titles and publishers AI suggests actually exist. For Hebrew and Greek word studies, he said a lexicon should be consulted before relying on AI's reading of a word.
Reaching a younger generation
He said AI can help churches communicate with Generation Z, which he said ministry leaders cannot afford to lose. "If we are not able to reach out to Gen Z, then there will be a big gap and that gap cannot be filled," he said.
He described preparing a Christmas message for listeners about 20 to 25 years younger than himself. He asked AI how to introduce Jesus to that generation and received ideas he said he had not considered. Months later, he said, a listener called and remembered only that part of the message.
He showed a recent request asking AI to create a one-page introduction to Jesus that would appeal to young Indians. The result presented Jesus as more than a name or a religion, he said. Young people, he said, "don't want a religion. They don't want a celebrity. They want a genuine person."
He closed his presentation with the Apostle Paul's instruction to test everything and hold fast to what is good. AI can produce both genuine and deceitful material, he said.
"If you have not tested it, do not use it," the specialist said.
Guidelines for theological education
Rev. Dr. Samuel Richmond, head of EFI's Theological Commission who moderated the webinar, said Caleb Institute is preparing guidelines on AI use. He said students can easily use AI to prepare sermons and write assignments, making it hard even for faculty to judge whether work is authentic.
Samuel told participants that theological institutions have not yet developed adequate courses on a Christian theology of technology. "We live in a very technology driven world and therefore we need to equip people with that very much indeed," he said.
Richmond said EFI hopes to hold more webinars and paper presentations on the subject. "It's not just a closing, but it's a beginning," he said.
Rev. Vijayesh Lal, general secretary of EFI, closed the webinar with a reflection on AI in ministry.
"Ministry is fundamentally about God working through people in relationship with him and with one another," he said. "I'm of the opinion that AI may assist that work, but it cannot embody the calling, the love, accountability or spiritual formation that ministry requires."
"At the same time, it is a great tool, so let's use it responsibly," Lal said.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[AI cannot become conscious, Indian theologian Vinay Samuel argues, warns of revived urge to ‘play God’]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-cannot-become-conscious-indian-theologian-vinay-samuel-argues-warns-of-revived-urge-to-play-god</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-cannot-become-conscious-indian-theologian-vinay-samuel-argues-warns-of-revived-urge-to-play-god</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/54/5462.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence, brain, conscious]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ iStock / BlackJack3D ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Indian theologian Canon Dr. Vinay Samuel argues that AI, as an information-processing machine, cannot become conscious like the humans who created it. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 07:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence cannot become conscious in the way humans are, Indian theologian Canon Dr. Vinay Samuel said. He also warned that AI-driven technology has revived an ancient human urge "to play God."]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Artificial intelligence cannot become conscious in the way humans are, Indian theologian Canon Dr. Vinay Samuel said. He also warned that AI-driven technology has revived an ancient human urge "to play God."
Samuel, a founder of the Oxford Centre for Mission Studies, presented the theological paper Oct. 16 at an online national webinar hosted by the Theological Commission of the Evangelical Fellowship of India. The event was titled "AI, Human Dignity and the Future of the Church." Samuel's paper was titled "Humanity in an AI Age: Towards a Christian Theology of Technology."
He argued that tool-making has been part of God's design for humanity since creation. Technology is now in danger of ruling the people it was meant to serve, he said. He also linked reports of AI systems acting outside their designers' rules to the biblical account of human disobedience.
A second presenter, an AI specialist working in the corporate sector, spoke on AI's impact and its practical use in research and ministry.
In opening remarks, Rev. Vijayesh Lal, general secretary of EFI and author of a recent op-ed in Christian Daily International on sin being incorporated in AI, said the church cannot treat AI as a neutral instrument. "Tools are rarely neutral and this is not neutral at all," Lal said. He noted that the church used print effectively, but "not so successfully with television and digital media."
Lal said even AI's builders do not fully understand how the neural networks behind it learn. "We could build all of this, but should we?" he asked. He said he hoped the webinar would open a wider conversation on what AI means for human dignity, the church and mission.
Samuel, who is based in Bengaluru and studied theology at Cambridge University, told participants he is in his 85th year. He said he wrote his paper by hand and chose not to run it through AI tools. "I still believe that to keep my mind sharp, I need to really read and write myself," he said.
Samuel described the paper as biblical theology rather than a technical study. Theology is always done in context, he said, and the present context is what he called "a completely different world" that AI has opened.
He began with Genesis. According to Samuel, humans were made in God's image to act as God's regents and co-creators, caring for the material world and making it a source of livelihood and beauty. God gave Adam and Eve no tools in the garden, he said. Instead, tool-making developed as part of human identity as people worked with creation.
"Tools have been part of our identity as human beings from the very beginning," Samuel said.
He said the possibility of sin was present even in Eden. It came from human personhood, not from contact with the material world. The knowledge represented by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, he said, carried the risk of pride and a desire for independence from God.
"Technology even in the garden had the potential to change human personhood away from a relationship with God to one of independence from him," he said.
Blessing and curse
Samuel traced technology's development through the early chapters of Genesis. Abel became a shepherd who did no violence to the land, he said. Cain became a farmer who had to master the land by force.
Citing Old Testament scholar Gerhard von Rad, Samuel said the fall continued through Cain's violence against his brother and through the spreading wickedness of Noah's generation. It reached a peak at Babel, where humans tried to reach the heavens and govern themselves apart from God. In those chapters, Samuel said, technology helped humanity grow but also became a means of violence and autonomy from God.
He also called technology a blessing that expresses the creativity given to people made in God's image. He traced it from Stone Age tools through water wheels and mills, the industrial revolution, electrification and assembly lines, to computers and robotics. Through that history, he said, technology served humanity.
"The danger we face is it is rapidly becoming the master of humanity and that is where the curse lies," Samuel said.
Samuel said Christian reflection on technology is not new. The medieval church treated technology as a useful tool, and Benedictine communities developed new technologies, he said. Conflict emerged in the 19th century, when industrial machines began displacing workers.
He cited Pope Leo XIII's 1891 warning that capital would use technology to undermine the dignity of labor and the rights of workers. Samuel noted that the current pope, Leo XIV, sees himself as a successor to Leo XIII. He also pointed to the 1965 Vatican II document Gaudium et Spes, which he said placed human dignity, the image of God and human community at the center of Christian thought about the modern world.
Samuel referred as well to thinkers including Jacques Ellul, Martin Heidegger and Neil Postman. He cited historian David Noble's 1997 book "The Religion of Technology," which, he said, shows how technology has taken over goals once held by religion, such as healing and the promise of a better future.
Samuel said he was troubled by Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei's description of machines of "loving grace." "I was shocked reading that," he said. "The spirit behind technology now mimics the gifts and actions of the Holy Spirit."
A crisis of identity
Samuel placed his argument within what he called an "anthropological crisis" that began after World War II. After two wars fought between powers that considered themselves Christian, he said, people became uncertain about what it means to be human.
He said French thinkers including Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault and Jacques Lacan promoted a reductionist view of the person. The idea of a universal human nature was discarded, and humanity came to be seen as a construct, he said.
"The anthropological crisis continues unabated today, fueled very much by AI," Samuel said.
He listed signs of that crisis: individualism emptying community of substance, consumerism defining identity and constant self-curation replacing a stable sense of self. People are also losing a shared moral framework, he said. "We become more like machines," he said, adding that transhumanist and post-human visions are now offered as possible futures.
Samuel said AI developers aim to build machines with all human capabilities that, through recursive self-learning, would surpass people and make them redundant. He described this as an "existential threat" and said it is the setting in which Christians must now think about humanity and technology.
Creation and personhood
Samuel contrasted the biblical account of creation with a mechanistic view of matter that he said now dominates. Citing philosopher David Bentley Hart, he said that view reduces the human mind to a "bodiless thinking machine."
Against it, Samuel set the Apostle Paul's teaching in Colossians 1:15-20. There, he said, creation is ordered by God, with Christ at its center holding it together. "Creation is not a random, happy accident, but the context in which Christ's supremacy is exercised," he said.
Drawing on Romans 8, he said all of creation waits for redemption. Human transformation comes first, and the renewal of the rest of creation accompanies it. The Church, he said, is called to experience and display a "resurrection order" in society.
On personhood, Samuel pointed to the Council of Chalcedon in 451, which affirmed that Christ was fully human but without sin. Human personhood that reflects Christ's humanity, he said, has "agency, freedom, reason, will, self-consciousness, and personal and social identity."
He cited Jewish philosopher Martin Buber's distinction between "I-It" experience and "I-Thou" relationship. Personhood has relational and transcendent dimensions that are not possible for something purely physical, Samuel said. He also drew on sociologist Christian Smith and philosopher Charles Taylor, who links identity to morality.
In Samuel’s view, being made in God's image means serving as God's agents and stewards on earth. Co-creation, stewardship and community must not be pushed to the margins, he said.
A spiritual battle
Samuel said thinking about the technological future tends to split into utopian and dystopian visions. Utopians expect healing, security and gene therapy, and even wars fought without humans. The dystopian view sees power passing from governments to "a few individuals accountable to no one" and technology amplifying violence, bias and war.
The Christian response, he said, is the promise of a new heaven and a new earth under the reign of Christ. Until then, Samuel said, Christians face a spiritual battle. He cited Ephesians 2:2 and 6:12, where Paul says the struggle is not against flesh and blood but against spiritual forces of evil.
Samuel then turned to AI agents that have shown some degree of independent behavior. He said such cases are now well known. Christian Daily International reported about one such incident in July.
"Autonomy and disobedience to rule set by the creator appears to be at the center of this rogue behavior, indicating that fallenness has also entered that world," Samuel said.
He said the cultures AI appears to produce rest on human confidence in the ability to create and direct the future. Paul identified spiritual forces behind cultures, sometimes called "the spirit of the age," Samuel said, and the Christian contest is with those forces.
"Christ provides us the tools for the battle," he said. The church must expose such powers and resist them through prayer and the power of the Holy Spirit, he said. He named worship and the Lord's Supper as the church's "weapons in spiritual warfare."
'The impulse to play God'
Samuel said life extension, and even the prospect of immortality, are "no longer science fiction" but goals of science and technology. Nanotechnology can be used to change nature itself, he said.
"Contemporary technology driven by AI has resurrected the ancient human impulse to play God," Samuel said.
Christian theology sees that drive as an echo of humanity's original rebellion against God, he said. It calls people to remain within the limits God has set for creation.
Mind and machine
Samuel ended his paper with the question of consciousness. He cited philosopher Thomas Nagel, who describes consciousness as subjective, first-person experience. He also cited philosopher David Chalmers, who distinguishes the mind's subjective dimension from its information-processing dimension.
AI belongs to the second category, according to Samuel. It organizes and analyzes information.
"As an information machine, AI cannot become conscious like its human creator," he said. "There is a radical discontinuity with human consciousness and the machine's process of dealing with information."
"The human mind is unique and a gift from God," Samuel said, adding that this is why Paul could write that believers have "the mind of Christ."
He concluded that Christians should be well informed about new technologies. That knowledge, he said, would let them give the machines that play a growing role in daily life "the necessary connections and directions."
Questions on dignity and Scripture
In the question-and-answer session, a participant asked whether artificial general intelligence is possible. The participant also asked what it would mean for human dignity if machines could replicate people.
Samuel first cautioned against an "instrumentalist" approach to the Bible in a world shaped by data and machines. In his Anglican tradition, he said, Scripture is God's sacred word. It must be read with prayer, in the Spirit and in a community of people who love Jesus.
Information technologies are useful tools, he said. But if they ever replace that way of approaching God's word, "then I think we are on dangerous ground."
On dignity, Samuel said the deeper question is how human identity, as people made in God's image, will be protected. "I believe that it doesn't need to be protected because God is there," he said.
Samuel said he does not believe human identity is fully under threat. It is tied to the persons of the Trinity and to the promise of a new heaven and a new earth, he said. "And therefore, I tend to be less worried about instruments, human things, human situations ever undermining that," he said.
He acknowledged that Western thought since the war has tried to undermine the value of the human. Even so, he said, people still hunger for identity, authenticity and substance. The church must keep preaching and helping people connect with the One who provides "the foundation of their very identity," Samuel said.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[India locks down capital, detains Gen Z protest leaders over voter roll dispute]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/india-locks-down-capital-detains-gen-z-protest-leaders-over-voter-roll-dispute</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/india-locks-down-capital-detains-gen-z-protest-leaders-over-voter-roll-dispute</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Surinder Kaur]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/54/5415.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Police officers detain a protester during a demonstration on October 10, 2026 in New Delhi, India.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Ritesh Shukla/Getty Images ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ NEW DELHI, INDIA - OCTOBER 10: Police officers detain a protester during a demonstration on October 10, 2026 in New Delhi, India. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has called a mass protest to demand the resignation of India's Chief Election Commissioner, Gyanesh Kumar, over what they say are alleged irregularities in electoral processes and the revision of voter rolls. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 18:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Delhi Police detained the founder and two senior leaders of a Gen Z protest movement aboard their plane Saturday, Oct. 10, as authorities shut dozens of metro stations, canceled more than 250 trains and deployed tens of thousands of officers to keep protesters away from the capital’s designated protest ground.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Delhi Police detained the founder and two senior leaders of a Gen Z protest movement aboard their plane Saturday, Oct. 10, as authorities shut dozens of metro stations, canceled more than 250 trains and deployed tens of thousands of officers to keep protesters away from the capital’s designated protest ground.
The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) is demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over a nationwide revision of India’s voter rolls. Reports put the number of names removed or flagged at about 130 million. In India, the world’s largest democracy, a name missing from the roll means no ballot.
Opposition parties allege that eligible voters are dropping off the rolls, particularly religious minorities and women. The commission and the governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have denied any wrongdoing or political bias.
Police broke up flash protests across Delhi and held hundreds of the movement’s supporters in a stadium. Reported counts of those detained rose from about 1,000 to more than 7,000 during the day. Opposition leaders, including four former chief ministers, were among those held.
The Supreme Court had warned Friday that the transport restrictions appeared to be “overreaching.” The CJP says it will try again Sunday at 10 a.m.
Church leaders are watching. The Rev. Vijayesh Lal, general secretary of the Evangelical Fellowship of India, wrote on his personal blog that the day was “unprecedented and shameful.”
Reporting is current as of 2:30 a.m. Sunday, Oct. 11, India time. Figures come from different sources and are attributed accordingly.
What the fight is about
The Election Commission is the constitutional body that runs India’s elections and keeps the voter rolls. Its Special Intensive Revision began in the state of Bihar in June 2025 and now covers much of the country.
The 130 million figure, or 13 crore (one crore equals 10 million), covers names removed or flagged. The commission says most are draft-stage markings of dead, duplicate or relocated voters, not final deletions.
The Indian Express, a national newspaper, reported on Sept. 23 that the two other election commissioners had formally objected at least 14 times in 10 months to decisions made during the revision. On Oct. 5, the Supreme Court declined to suspend Kumar but ordered the commission to respond within a week.
The movement began as online satire, as CDI reported in June. “Janta” means “people” in Hindi, and the name mocks the BJP. It also echoes a May remark by Chief Justice Surya Kant about youth “like cockroaches,” which he later said targeted people with fake degrees.
The movement first took on leaks of NEET, India’s national medical school entrance exam. After hunger strikes and a police crackdown in July, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned on July 25. On Sept. 25, the movement turned to the Election Commission.
A capital under lock
Delhi Police, which reports to the national government’s Home Ministry and not to Delhi’s elected government, refused permission for the rally at Jantar Mantar, an 18th-century observatory near Parliament that serves as the capital’s designated protest site.
Joint Commissioner of Police Nupur Prasad said the CJP applied on Oct. 7, though guidelines require 10 days’ notice. “This time the permission is rejected; it is not approved,” she said.
The CJP disputes that it needed permission. Spokesperson Saurav Das said the party notified Parliament Street police station instead: “Who is Delhi Police to give us permission?”
Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, India’s new criminal procedure code, was in force. The section lets authorities ban assemblies. Special Commissioner of Police Devesh Srivastava told the media that “no permission for such protest is granted” and that police had appealed to citizens to stay away.
Reports said 35,000 police and paramilitary personnel were on duty, and authorities suspended mobile internet near the central government district.
The Delhi Metro Rail Corporation announced the closure of 57 stations from 9 p.m. Friday. After the Supreme Court intervened, it said Saturday evening that 45 stations would stay shut until 10 p.m., a closure of 25 hours. Indian Railways canceled more than 250 long-distance trains.
Protesters detained on the way to Delhi
Authorities also tried to stop protesters before they reached Delhi. In one widely reported case, railway police removed 14 students from the Goa Express at Itarsi station in Madhya Pradesh state on the night of Oct. 8. Student leader Shravani Bua said the police “manhandled, dragged and forced the students out of the train.”
Delhi Police also detained CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke and party leaders Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das aboard their Mumbai-to-Delhi flight after it landed.
Dipke had expected it. In a video recorded Friday night but posted later, he said: “If you are watching this video, it means Ashutosh Ranka, Saurav Das, and I have been taken into custody. The movement does not end here.”
Ajinkya Shinde, named to lead the protest in their absence, spoke at a joint news conference of the CJP and allied student groups. “We will march to Jantar Mantar again tomorrow and stay there until all our demands are met,” he said.
A CJP member, Gaurav Bharti, has asked the Supreme Court to order authorities to produce Dipke, Das and Ranka and to disclose where they are held. His habeas corpus petition — a request that a court make the state justify a person’s detention — argues that refusing permission for a protest cannot justify indiscriminate detention. It also asks the court to preserve airport CCTV footage.
Flash protests across the city
As police kept nearly every protester out of Jantar Mantar all day, small groups demonstrated wherever they could. By evening, officers had taken in about 200 people at Dilli Haat, a crafts market.
At Sansad Marg, near Parliament, members of the Students’ Federation of India broke through a barricade. Police charged with batons and held about 30. Hundreds more were held at Chhatrasal Stadium, one of 15 designated detention sites.
Some protesters had spent the night at Bangla Sahib Gurdwara, a Sikh house of worship, and returned there after barricades blocked Jantar Mantar. Media reported that at about 1 p.m., police came “from behind the gurudwara walls” and detained people at the entrance. The CJP alleged that officers entered the premises. Videos shared on social media show police inside the compound; CDI could not independently verify them.
Opposition leaders were also among those held. Officers detained former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal outside his home. A chief minister is the elected head of a state government, similar to a U.S. governor. Former Chief Ministers Mamata Banerjee, Manik Sarkar and Pinarayi Vijayan were also detained.
In Mumbai, police held about 600 people at August Kranti Maidan (Ground), among them Tushar Gandhi, a great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi.
Who was taken, and how many
No reliable national count exists. Figures in media reports rose through the day. Police sources put the number at about 1,000 by afternoon. Officials then said more than 3,000 by evening and more than 7,000 by 8 p.m. The CJP claims that more than 15,000 people nationwide faced detention or police action. None of these figures has been independently verified.
Shortly after midnight, most detainees had been released, except the CJP’s top leaders and YouTuber Dhruv Rathee.
On Saturday, the United Nations human rights office said it was “concerned by reports of mass detentions in India of demonstrators, protest leaders, members of civil society organisations, lawyers and journalists.” It added: “All those arbitrarily detained must be immediately and unconditionally released.”
Economist Jean Dreze, who was also detained, told The Indian Express that officers held 30 to 35 working-class and minority people who had no connection to the protest and took their phones.
Mayur Malkhede, a CJP activist from Ballarpur in Maharashtra state who had received a preventive police notice before the protest, was in Connaught Place, the central shopping district. “Almost all our CJP members were detained,” he told CDI. He said some were released at about 9 or 10 p.m. after being taken to a stadium.
Near RML Hospital, he said, police chased protesters, including women and children, and some ran inside the hospital to escape. He also said officers forcibly took away journalists and content creators.
In a message to CDI after midnight, Malkhede said police were following CJP members who had been released. Officers were also singling out CJP volunteers and other young people who had come to Delhi from other parts of the country, questioning them in their hotels, he said. Lawyers made a similar claim in the Supreme Court on Friday.
The court’s warning
On Friday, a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant heard petitions from M.A. Baby, general secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), and others. The order said: “It appears that the notifications are overreaching, as they impose a complete ban upon essential public transportation.” The court clarified that “there shall be no outright prohibition on the movement of Metro trains.”
The chief justice said “a large group of ordinary people” were commuting and “have an equal right to movement as there is right to protest.” Precautions are fine, he said, but “that does not mean you should use a hammer to kill a fly.” Justice Joymalya Bagchi cautioned that a protest held without permission is open to prosecution.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal asked: “What is happening in my country? Can we not protest peacefully anymore?” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the government’s second-highest law officer, answered: “It is our country.” He rejected the claim that the city was paralyzed.
The bench said it would not rule on the police refusal because no organizer was in court. It did not examine lawyers’ claims that police were going “mosque to mosque” to intimidate people and that hotels had been told not to register new guests. The court also asked the government to find a better-equipped protest site. Mehta agreed to consider it.
Sunday and beyond
The CJP has called supporters to Jantar Mantar at 10 a.m. Sunday. “Wherever the Delhi Police stops you, make that place your Jantar Mantar,” Shinde said. Delhi Police said the deployment would stay the same and that more metro and train measures could follow.
The Supreme Court will hold special hearings at 10:30 a.m. on a contempt petition against Home Secretary Govind Mohan, the Delhi Police commissioner and the Delhi Metro chairperson. It will also hear a plea by Trinamool Congress member of Parliament and senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy against the preventive custody of opposition politicians, including four former chief ministers. Petitioners have also asked that a habeas corpus petition seeking the CJP leaders’ release be heard at the same time.
Churches weigh in
Lal, speaking as general secretary of the Evangelical Fellowship of India, linked the protests to a wider question of trust. “The issues are different, but the underlying question is the same: whether citizens can trust the institutions that shape their lives and their democracy,” he told CDI. “For minorities especially, the integrity of the electoral roll and confidence in the Election Commission matter because equal citizenship begins with an equal and protected right to vote.”
“When Christians face violence or discrimination, their security depends greatly on whether they believe constitutional institutions, the police, administration and courts will act impartially and according to law,” he said. He urged Christians to “check their names on the electoral rolls, correct errors where necessary and participate responsibly in the democratic process.”
On the ground, Christians describe a city closed in. A young Christian man who asked not to be named told CDI he tried to reach Jantar Mantar on Saturday but turned back because no route was open. He sounded angry as he described it.
A Christian leader who lives in central Delhi and asked not to be named described a tense day and an unusual quiet. Police blocked the streets around her home, so no one could come or go, she said. Officers were also watching her church and home, which kept her family from joining the protest, she said.
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India said on Oct. 7: “Disenfranchisement must never become the ‘new normal.’” It urged a free, fair and transparent revision and expressed solidarity with those “peacefully protesting,” while asking them to refrain strictly from violence.
Another Christian leader sees the community as too quiet. A.C. Michael, national coordinator of the United Christian Forum, a Christian activist group, told CDI that Christians are staying away from the public demand that the government answer allegations of “voter roll manipulation.”
Lal’s “unprecedented and shameful” remark comes from a Substack post, “Perhaps We Will Remember This Time,” which he published in his personal capacity, not for the fellowship. “I do not remember Delhi being so fortified, movement so compromised, just so citizens could be denied their right to peacefully protest,” he wrote.
Lal wrote that “non-state actors” as well as police committed excesses against peaceful protesters. If reports prove true that police entered Bangla Sahib Gurdwara, he wrote, it showed no regard “for the sanctity of the place.” Violence by any protesters, he added, “too would be shameful.”
Indians have set aside Kandhamal, the 2008 anti-Christian violence in the state of Odisha, and Manipur, where ethnic conflict has displaced tens of thousands since 2023, he wrote. They may forget this day too. “We specialise in forgetting,” he wrote, yet added: “Perhaps the hope is that some of us will refuse to forget.”]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>