<rss
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"
><channel>
        <title>Christian Daily International | Science & Technology</title>
        <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/science-and-tech</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Explore the intersection of science, technology, and faith. From AI and digital evangelism to ethical debates, discover how Christians worldwide engage with innovation while staying rooted in biblical truth.]]></description>
        
        <copyright>Christian Daily International © 2026</copyright>
        <language>en</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 03:16:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="https://www.christiandaily.com/science-and-tech?format=xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <atom:link href="https://www.christiandaily.com/science-and-tech" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
        <generator>Xiaoman</generator>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[German Christian broadcaster ERF and German Bible Society to launch joint Bible app in 2027]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/german-christian-broadcaster-erf-and-german-bible-society-to-launch-joint-bible-app-in-2027</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/german-christian-broadcaster-erf-and-german-bible-society-to-launch-joint-bible-app-in-2027</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/55/5519.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Christoph Rösel, left, of the German Bible Society and Christian Kolb of ERF. The two organizations plan to launch a joint Bible app in mid-2027.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ ERF ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Christoph Rösel, left, of the German Bible Society and Christian Kolb of ERF. The two organizations plan to launch a joint Bible app in mid-2027. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 13:14:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[The Christian media organization ERF – Der Sinnsender and the German Bible Society are developing a free Bible app together, with a launch planned for mid-2027, the two organizations said in a joint press release.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
The Christian media organization ERF – Der Sinnsender and the German Bible Society are developing a free Bible app together, with a launch planned for mid-2027, the two organizations said in a joint press release.
The app will offer short devotional prompts meant to help people make Bible reading part of their daily routines, according to the partners. Selected users will test early versions and help shape the final product.
"The free offering is intended to give people simple, contemporary access to the Bible and to support them in discovering biblical texts in their everyday lives," said Christoph Rösel, general secretary of the Stuttgart-based German Bible Society, known in German as Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
Each partner brings different strengths to the project. Rösel said the Bible society would supply its theological and editorial expertise, its translations and networks, and its long record of encouraging Bible reading.
ERF, whose name stands for Evangeliums-Rundfunk, will contribute experience in digital product development, technology, infrastructure and fundraising, said Christian Kolb, a managing member of the organization's executive board. He said the two partners together draw more than 1.5 million visitors a month across their platforms.
Kolb said the aim was a widely used app that would "meaningfully complement" the services both organizations already provide.
Work on the app begins in the final months of 2026. Its planned release falls in the 25th anniversary year of ERF Bibleserver, an online Bible platform the Wetzlar-based broadcaster has run since 2002, the press release said.
Timotheus Israel, who leads the ERF Bibleserver unit, said many people rely on the website for personal study.
"With the app, we want to expand the offering and make it easier to get started reading the Bible," Israel said. Brief devotional content that fits into ordinary days would be central to that approach, he added.
Manuel Stemmler, head of the German Bible Society's digital department, said readers trust the quality of the society's Bible editions and study materials.
"The joint app creates moments in everyday life in which people encounter the Bible personally," Stemmler said.
Test phases are planned during development, in which participants can comment on the app's features, content and ease of use. The organizations said that input would guide adjustments to the app in stages so that it matches what its intended users need.
The German Bible Society's existing digital services and ERF Bibleserver will continue to operate independently of the new app, according to the release.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[AI cannot become conscious, Indian theologian Vinay Samuel argues, warns of revived urge to ‘play God’]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-cannot-become-conscious-indian-theologian-vinay-samuel-argues-warns-of-revived-urge-to-play-god</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-cannot-become-conscious-indian-theologian-vinay-samuel-argues-warns-of-revived-urge-to-play-god</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/54/5462.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence, brain, conscious]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ iStock / BlackJack3D ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Indian theologian Canon Dr. Vinay Samuel argues that AI, as an information-processing machine, cannot become conscious like the humans who created it. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 07:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence cannot become conscious in the way humans are, Indian theologian Canon Dr. Vinay Samuel said. He also warned that AI-driven technology has revived an ancient human urge "to play God."]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Artificial intelligence cannot become conscious in the way humans are, Indian theologian Canon Dr. Vinay Samuel said. He also warned that AI-driven technology has revived an ancient human urge "to play God."
Samuel, a founder of the Oxford Centre for Mission Studies, presented the theological paper Oct. 16 at an online national webinar hosted by the Theological Commission of the Evangelical Fellowship of India. The event was titled "AI, Human Dignity and the Future of the Church." Samuel's paper was titled "Humanity in an AI Age: Towards a Christian Theology of Technology."
He argued that tool-making has been part of God's design for humanity since creation. Technology is now in danger of ruling the people it was meant to serve, he said. He also linked reports of AI systems acting outside their designers' rules to the biblical account of human disobedience.
A second presenter, an AI specialist working in the corporate sector, spoke on AI's impact and its practical use in research and ministry.
In opening remarks, Rev. Vijayesh Lal, general secretary of EFI and author of a recent op-ed in Christian Daily International on sin being incorporated in AI, said the church cannot treat AI as a neutral instrument. "Tools are rarely neutral and this is not neutral at all," Lal said. He noted that the church used print effectively, but "not so successfully with television and digital media."
Lal said even AI's builders do not fully understand how the neural networks behind it learn. "We could build all of this, but should we?" he asked. He said he hoped the webinar would open a wider conversation on what AI means for human dignity, the church and mission.
Samuel, who is based in Bengaluru and studied theology at Cambridge University, told participants he is in his 85th year. He said he wrote his paper by hand and chose not to run it through AI tools. "I still believe that to keep my mind sharp, I need to really read and write myself," he said.
Samuel described the paper as biblical theology rather than a technical study. Theology is always done in context, he said, and the present context is what he called "a completely different world" that AI has opened.
He began with Genesis. According to Samuel, humans were made in God's image to act as God's regents and co-creators, caring for the material world and making it a source of livelihood and beauty. God gave Adam and Eve no tools in the garden, he said. Instead, tool-making developed as part of human identity as people worked with creation.
"Tools have been part of our identity as human beings from the very beginning," Samuel said.
He said the possibility of sin was present even in Eden. It came from human personhood, not from contact with the material world. The knowledge represented by the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, he said, carried the risk of pride and a desire for independence from God.
"Technology even in the garden had the potential to change human personhood away from a relationship with God to one of independence from him," he said.
Blessing and curse
Samuel traced technology's development through the early chapters of Genesis. Abel became a shepherd who did no violence to the land, he said. Cain became a farmer who had to master the land by force.
Citing Old Testament scholar Gerhard von Rad, Samuel said the fall continued through Cain's violence against his brother and through the spreading wickedness of Noah's generation. It reached a peak at Babel, where humans tried to reach the heavens and govern themselves apart from God. In those chapters, Samuel said, technology helped humanity grow but also became a means of violence and autonomy from God.
He also called technology a blessing that expresses the creativity given to people made in God's image. He traced it from Stone Age tools through water wheels and mills, the industrial revolution, electrification and assembly lines, to computers and robotics. Through that history, he said, technology served humanity.
"The danger we face is it is rapidly becoming the master of humanity and that is where the curse lies," Samuel said.
Samuel said Christian reflection on technology is not new. The medieval church treated technology as a useful tool, and Benedictine communities developed new technologies, he said. Conflict emerged in the 19th century, when industrial machines began displacing workers.
He cited Pope Leo XIII's 1891 warning that capital would use technology to undermine the dignity of labor and the rights of workers. Samuel noted that the current pope, Leo XIV, sees himself as a successor to Leo XIII. He also pointed to the 1965 Vatican II document Gaudium et Spes, which he said placed human dignity, the image of God and human community at the center of Christian thought about the modern world.
Samuel referred as well to thinkers including Jacques Ellul, Martin Heidegger and Neil Postman. He cited historian David Noble's 1997 book "The Religion of Technology," which, he said, shows how technology has taken over goals once held by religion, such as healing and the promise of a better future.
Samuel said he was troubled by Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei's description of machines of "loving grace." "I was shocked reading that," he said. "The spirit behind technology now mimics the gifts and actions of the Holy Spirit."
A crisis of identity
Samuel placed his argument within what he called an "anthropological crisis" that began after World War II. After two wars fought between powers that considered themselves Christian, he said, people became uncertain about what it means to be human.
He said French thinkers including Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault and Jacques Lacan promoted a reductionist view of the person. The idea of a universal human nature was discarded, and humanity came to be seen as a construct, he said.
"The anthropological crisis continues unabated today, fueled very much by AI," Samuel said.
He listed signs of that crisis: individualism emptying community of substance, consumerism defining identity and constant self-curation replacing a stable sense of self. People are also losing a shared moral framework, he said. "We become more like machines," he said, adding that transhumanist and post-human visions are now offered as possible futures.
Samuel said AI developers aim to build machines with all human capabilities that, through recursive self-learning, would surpass people and make them redundant. He described this as an "existential threat" and said it is the setting in which Christians must now think about humanity and technology.
Creation and personhood
Samuel contrasted the biblical account of creation with a mechanistic view of matter that he said now dominates. Citing philosopher David Bentley Hart, he said that view reduces the human mind to a "bodiless thinking machine."
Against it, Samuel set the Apostle Paul's teaching in Colossians 1:15-20. There, he said, creation is ordered by God, with Christ at its center holding it together. "Creation is not a random, happy accident, but the context in which Christ's supremacy is exercised," he said.
Drawing on Romans 8, he said all of creation waits for redemption. Human transformation comes first, and the renewal of the rest of creation accompanies it. The Church, he said, is called to experience and display a "resurrection order" in society.
On personhood, Samuel pointed to the Council of Chalcedon in 451, which affirmed that Christ was fully human but without sin. Human personhood that reflects Christ's humanity, he said, has "agency, freedom, reason, will, self-consciousness, and personal and social identity."
He cited Jewish philosopher Martin Buber's distinction between "I-It" experience and "I-Thou" relationship. Personhood has relational and transcendent dimensions that are not possible for something purely physical, Samuel said. He also drew on sociologist Christian Smith and philosopher Charles Taylor, who links identity to morality.
In Samuel’s view, being made in God's image means serving as God's agents and stewards on earth. Co-creation, stewardship and community must not be pushed to the margins, he said.
A spiritual battle
Samuel said thinking about the technological future tends to split into utopian and dystopian visions. Utopians expect healing, security and gene therapy, and even wars fought without humans. The dystopian view sees power passing from governments to "a few individuals accountable to no one" and technology amplifying violence, bias and war.
The Christian response, he said, is the promise of a new heaven and a new earth under the reign of Christ. Until then, Samuel said, Christians face a spiritual battle. He cited Ephesians 2:2 and 6:12, where Paul says the struggle is not against flesh and blood but against spiritual forces of evil.
Samuel then turned to AI agents that have shown some degree of independent behavior. He said such cases are now well known. Christian Daily International reported about one such incident in July.
"Autonomy and disobedience to rule set by the creator appears to be at the center of this rogue behavior, indicating that fallenness has also entered that world," Samuel said.
He said the cultures AI appears to produce rest on human confidence in the ability to create and direct the future. Paul identified spiritual forces behind cultures, sometimes called "the spirit of the age," Samuel said, and the Christian contest is with those forces.
"Christ provides us the tools for the battle," he said. The church must expose such powers and resist them through prayer and the power of the Holy Spirit, he said. He named worship and the Lord's Supper as the church's "weapons in spiritual warfare."
'The impulse to play God'
Samuel said life extension, and even the prospect of immortality, are "no longer science fiction" but goals of science and technology. Nanotechnology can be used to change nature itself, he said.
"Contemporary technology driven by AI has resurrected the ancient human impulse to play God," Samuel said.
Christian theology sees that drive as an echo of humanity's original rebellion against God, he said. It calls people to remain within the limits God has set for creation.
Mind and machine
Samuel ended his paper with the question of consciousness. He cited philosopher Thomas Nagel, who describes consciousness as subjective, first-person experience. He also cited philosopher David Chalmers, who distinguishes the mind's subjective dimension from its information-processing dimension.
AI belongs to the second category, according to Samuel. It organizes and analyzes information.
"As an information machine, AI cannot become conscious like its human creator," he said. "There is a radical discontinuity with human consciousness and the machine's process of dealing with information."
"The human mind is unique and a gift from God," Samuel said, adding that this is why Paul could write that believers have "the mind of Christ."
He concluded that Christians should be well informed about new technologies. That knowledge, he said, would let them give the machines that play a growing role in daily life "the necessary connections and directions."
Questions on dignity and Scripture
In the question-and-answer session, a participant asked whether artificial general intelligence is possible. The participant also asked what it would mean for human dignity if machines could replicate people.
Samuel first cautioned against an "instrumentalist" approach to the Bible in a world shaped by data and machines. In his Anglican tradition, he said, Scripture is God's sacred word. It must be read with prayer, in the Spirit and in a community of people who love Jesus.
Information technologies are useful tools, he said. But if they ever replace that way of approaching God's word, "then I think we are on dangerous ground."
On dignity, Samuel said the deeper question is how human identity, as people made in God's image, will be protected. "I believe that it doesn't need to be protected because God is there," he said.
Samuel said he does not believe human identity is fully under threat. It is tied to the persons of the Trinity and to the promise of a new heaven and a new earth, he said. "And therefore, I tend to be less worried about instruments, human things, human situations ever undermining that," he said.
He acknowledged that Western thought since the war has tried to undermine the value of the human. Even so, he said, people still hunger for identity, authenticity and substance. The church must keep preaching and helping people connect with the One who provides "the foundation of their very identity," Samuel said.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[African faith leaders discuss AI safety and ethics at Nairobi roundtable]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/african-faith-leaders-discuss-ai-safety-and-ethics-at-nairobi-roundtable</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/african-faith-leaders-discuss-ai-safety-and-ethics-at-nairobi-roundtable</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent Matinde]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/54/5461.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Faith AI Covenant Nairobi]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ x/pthigio ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ The gathering in Nairobi was the third roundtable under the Faith-AI Covenant, an international initiative seeking to bring religious leaders and technology developers together to establish ethical principles for artificial intelligence. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 07:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[African Christian, Muslim and interfaith leaders joined technology experts and policymakers in Nairobi to discuss how artificial intelligence could affect young people's well-being, contribute to radicalization and shape the representation of African languages and values in digital systems.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
African Christian, Muslim and interfaith leaders joined technology experts and policymakers in Nairobi to discuss how artificial intelligence could affect young people's well-being, contribute to radicalization and shape the representation of African languages and values in digital systems.
The gathering on Oct. 13 was the third roundtable under the Faith-AI Covenant, an international initiative seeking to bring religious leaders and technology developers together to establish ethical principles for artificial intelligence.
Participants included representatives of the All Africa Conference of Churches and the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya, alongside Christian, Muslim and interfaith leaders, academics, civil society representatives and technology specialists.
The discussions focused on how faith communities and technology companies could work together to protect children, support young people's development and prevent artificial intelligence from being exploited to spread extremist messages.
The meeting was organized by the Interfaith Alliance for Safer Communities in partnership with Precognition, a London-based firm working in artificial intelligence and emerging technology.
One of the meeting's central themes was the influence of interactive digital environments on young people’s identities, relationships and moral development.
Organizers said discussions explored how artificial intelligence could be used to facilitate radicalization and what pastoral, technical and community-based interventions might help address the risks.
The meeting also examined AI’s effects on children’s emotional well-being, including the safeguards needed to ensure educational applications support healthy development.
Faith leaders, educators, technology developers and civil society groups were identified as having a shared responsibility in developing protections for children and young people.
Baroness Joanna Shields, chief executive of Precognition and co-chair of the Faith-AI Covenant, said artificial intelligence was advancing faster than institutions and communities could adapt.
“AI is advancing faster than our institutions and communities can adapt,” Shields said.
She argued that the technology was changing how people understand themselves, their work and their purpose.
“The purpose of this Covenant is not to slow innovation, but to ensure it is guided by conscience,” she said. “African voices are critical in helping define the values these systems carry, so dignity and resilience are designed in from the outset.”
African languages and local values
The roundtable also raised questions about whose languages, cultural experiences and ethical priorities are reflected in artificial intelligence systems.
Many AI models are developed using large collections of data, but the availability and quality of training material vary considerably across languages. Participants discussed the importance of ensuring African languages and local perspectives are represented as the technology develops.
The organizers said the discussions considered Kenya’s National AI Strategy 2025-2030 and the practical challenges of introducing ethical safeguards and human oversight in African settings.
Dana Humaid, chief executive of the Interfaith Alliance for Safer Communities and a co-chair of the initiative, said African faith leaders and technology specialists wanted technological development to advance alongside religious moderation and interfaith cooperation.
The Covenant draws partly on the United Arab Emirates' approach to combining investment in artificial intelligence with efforts to promote religious moderation and peaceful coexistence.
The Nairobi meeting brought together several prominent religious figures, including Cardinal John Olorunfemi Onaiyekan, archbishop emeritus of Abuja, and Bishop Fred Sheldon Mwesigwa of Ankole. 
Other participants included Ambassador Mussie Hailu of the United Religions Initiative for Africa, Imam Muhammad Nurayn Ashafa of Nigeria’s Interfaith Mediation Centre and Dr. Mustafa Yusuf Ali of Arigatou International in Nairobi.
Technology and policy organizations represented included IBM Research Africa, Qhala, Indigenius AI, Vambo AI and the Africa AI Council.
No covenant adopted yet
Despite its name, the Faith-AI Covenant has not yet been launched as a completed set of commitments. The initiative is developing shared principles and voluntary pledges through a series of international roundtables.
The Nairobi gathering followed earlier meetings in New York and Paris. Further discussions are planned in Asia before the Covenant’s launch in Abu Dhabi in 2027, according to its organizers.
The initiative aims to develop principles that protect human dignity, strengthen social trust and promote the common good while allowing technological innovation to continue.
Its next challenge will be translating broad ethical concerns into practical commitments that religious institutions, technology companies and policymakers can implement.
The Nairobi meeting did not announce a binding agreement or a specific policy change. Its immediate contribution was to bring African faith leaders and technology specialists into discussions about the social and ethical consequences of artificial intelligence.
As AI becomes more widely used for education, communication and personal guidance, the initiative's organizers argue that African religious communities should have a voice in determining how the technology develops and how its risks are addressed.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Bible App use surges across Africa as Senegal, Zimbabwe record 72% growth]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/bible-app-use-surges-across-africa-as-senegal-zimbabwe-record-72-growth</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/bible-app-use-surges-across-africa-as-senegal-zimbabwe-record-72-growth</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent Matinde]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/54/5430.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[YouVersion App in Africa]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ YouVersion ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ The daily user growth is part of a broader surge in digital Bible engagement across Sub-Saharan Africa, where daily use of YouVersion’s apps rose by 63% during the year. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 05:44:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Daily engagement with the Bible is growing sharply across parts of Africa, with Senegal and Zimbabwe recording a 72% increase in use of YouVersion’s Family of Apps during 2026, according to figures released by the Bible technology ministry.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Daily engagement with the Bible is growing sharply across parts of Africa, with Senegal and Zimbabwe recording a 72% increase in use of YouVersion’s Family of Apps during 2026, according to figures released by the Bible technology ministry. 
The daily user growth is part of a broader surge in digital Bible engagement across Sub-Saharan Africa, where daily use of YouVersion’s apps rose by 63% during the year. The growth far exceeded the 13% increase recorded globally, with YouVersion reporting 18.5 million people now using its apps each day.
The figures place several African countries among the fastest-growing markets highlighted by YouVersion in its 2026 data.
Senegal and Zimbabwe recorded the largest increases among the African countries, both rising by 72%. Ethiopia followed with a 52% increase, while the Democratic Republic of Congo recorded 48%. The record growth in Senegal is significant considering that 85-95% of the population identify as Muslim with a less than 10% Christian population.  
Uganda saw daily engagement rise by 41%, Nigeria by 37% and Kenya by 36%. Ghana recorded a 33% increase, while Tunisia rose by 33%, Egypt by 20% and Morocco by 13%. South Africa recorded an 8% increase.
The African daily Bible app users also stand out against the wider global figures. Pakistan recorded a 51% increase while Vietnam recorded 44%. Other notable surges include Iraq 49%, Argentina 25% and Mexico 18%.
YouVersion cautions through the presentation of its data that the map highlights countries with notable growth rather than providing a complete ranking of every country in the world. The African figures nevertheless show the continent emerging as one of the strongest areas of growth in daily digital Bible engagement.
According to YouVersion, Kenya began 2026 ranked fifth worldwide for daily Bible engagement and maintained that position throughout the year. Daily engagement in the country increased by 36%.
The number of Kenyans committed to reading through the Bible using the year plans also increased by nearly 50%. The country’s growth comes as YouVersion expanded its East Africa presence. In February 2026, the organization opened a regional hub in Nairobi to strengthen relationships with churches, ministries and content creators across Africa. At the time, YouVersion said Kenya was already one of its strongest markets for Bible engagement.
The scale of the growth is notable because they represent daily engagement, rather than simply the number of people downloading the app.
Globally, YouVersion added more than 160 million installs across its Family of Apps in 2026 after passing one billion installs in November 2025. Daily use increased faster than installations, reaching 18.5 million people each day. 
Turning to the Bible for answers
YouVersion said searches in Kenya included terms such as “anxiety”, “hope” and “healing”. Psalm 91 was the country’s most searched Bible verse during the year.
The pattern is particularly notable because Psalm 91 is centered on refuge and protection, while the other searches point to people using the Bible while seeking answers around emotional and personal concerns.
Still, the wider growth shows that Africans are increasingly returning to digital Scripture resources as part of their regular routines.
Bobby Gruenewald, founder and CEO of YouVersion, said it is encouraging to see “how many people are turning to Scripture for answers to their questions.” 
He said Global Bible Month, which returns in November, would provide an opportunity for more people to engage with Scripture through the 30-Day Bible Challenge.
Nearly 3 million people worldwide signed up for the challenge during its first year in 2025. This year's edition will include a feature allowing participants to track their progress and see how friends are engaging with the challenge.
In celebration of Global Bible Month, YouVersion will bring Scripture to some of the world’s most recognizable public spaces, including Times Square in New York, Piccadilly Circus in London and the Dotonbori District in Osaka, Japan. The activations will reach people in some of the world's busiest locations, bringing Scripture into everyday life.
African voices are becoming more prominent
YouVersion’s growth in Africa is also being accompanied by an effort to increase locally produced and culturally relevant Bible content.
The Family of Apps now provides access to more than 3,800 Bible versions in 2,400 languages. YouVersion says it works with more than 45,000 churches and content partners globally, including more than 2,600 churches and partners in Africa. 
“People have loved seeing faces they know, hearing voices they trust locally and finding contexts, and even accents, they can relate to,” Gachira said.
That localization is becoming increasingly important as YouVersion expands its network of regional hubs. The organization already has hubs in Kenya and South Africa, among other countries, and plans to open a hub in Nigeria before the end of 2026. 
The growth also comes as African Christian publishers and ministries increasingly use digital platforms to distribute Bible reading plans and other discipleship resources. 
A September initiative involving YouVersion East Africa, for example, brought together 17 African Christian authors from three countries through a collection of 18 Bible reading plans.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[German churches launch initiative calling for child-appropriate AI standards]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/german-churches-launch-initiative-calling-for-child-appropriate-ai-standards</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/german-churches-launch-initiative-calling-for-child-appropriate-ai-standards</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/54/5442.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[A child uses an artificial intelligence chatbot on a smartphone while doing homework.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ iStock / Chong Kee Sliong ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ A child uses an artificial intelligence chatbot on a smartphone while doing homework. Germany’s Protestant and Catholic churches launched the initiative “KI kindgerecht!” (“Child-Appropriate AI!”) on Oct. 14, 2026, with the children’s media network Seitenstark. The initiative calls for a code of conduct, quality standards and legislation for AI products used by children. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Germany's main Protestant and Catholic church bodies have joined a children's media association in launching an initiative that calls for binding standards on artificial intelligence products used by children, including a code of conduct for developers and new legal obligations for providers.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Germany's main Protestant and Catholic church bodies have joined a children's media association in launching an initiative that calls for binding standards on artificial intelligence products used by children, including a code of conduct for developers and new legal obligations for providers.
The initiative, "KI kindgerecht!" ("Child-Appropriate AI!"), was announced Oct. 14 by the Evangelical Church in Germany, or EKD, the umbrella body of the country's regional Protestant churches. Its partners include the EKD, the Church and Society Department of the German Bishops' Conference secretariat, the Protestant media agency GEP and Seitenstark, a network of German children's websites.
The organizers said they are responding to 56 recommendations issued in June by a federal expert commission on protecting children and young people online. In the EKD's announcement, they argued that shielding children from harm is insufficient on its own and that children also need access to good digital services, adult guidance and the skills to use AI themselves. They rejected a blanket ban on AI for minors as unworkable.
"AI is already embedded in many digital applications," said Bishop Georg Bätzing, chairman of the bishops' conference's Commission for Media. He said Pope Leo XIV's encyclical Magnifica humanitas gives the church "a clear mandate" to defend human dignity in the age of AI, "especially where children are easily exposed to dangers."
Bätzing said responsibility "must not be shifted onto parents alone," and named providers, policymakers, educational institutions, civil society and families as sharing it. "Technology must serve people, not purely economic interests," he said.
A code of conduct for interactive AI
The initiative sets out three measures. The first is a voluntary code of conduct for interactive AI aimed at children, which the churches and Seitenstark plan to draft with researchers, educators and interested companies.
According to the EKD, the code will rest on five principles: safety by design, respect for children's rights, age-appropriate spaces for participation, data protection, and human oversight of AI systems.
Building on that code, the partners plan to develop practical quality standards. These are meant to serve as a reference for developers, providers and educational institutions that design or use AI applications for children.
The third measure is a call for legislation obliging providers to meet child-appropriate standards. The partners also want sustained public funding for media education so that children, parents and education professionals can learn to use AI competently.
Participation is open to schools, media providers, researchers, parents' associations, businesses and individuals, the announcement said. It closed with a question: "Will we shape AI for children — or will we leave it to AI to shape our children?"
'The last to be asked'
Darja Martens, a board member of Seitenstark, said young people have largely been left out of decisions about technology they already use.
"Children today are the first to grow up with AI. But often the last to be asked about how it is designed," she said.
Children need protected spaces where they can test, understand and question AI at a level suited to their age, Martens said. Seitenstark will contribute its experience in children's media and from its quality seal for digital children's media, which the group says it has awarded since 2022.
Dorothee Wüst, church president of the Evangelical Church of the Palatinate and chair of GEP's supervisory board, said children "must neither be left alone nor excluded in the digital space." The partners want to help ensure that children can use AI "safely and in a self-determined way," she said.
New risks, yet a ban is not the answer
On its website, the initiative lists the dangers it sees in digital media. They include graphic images of war, targeted disinformation, deepfakes and AI-generated nude images, as well as hate speech, cyberbullying, online grooming and sexualized violence.
Generative AI that interacts with users brings new risks to privacy and data protection, the site says. It also warns that known threats to children's physical and mental health are growing more severe, and that existing approaches to protecting minors in the media are reaching their limits.
The partners describe public debate on children and digital media, including current arguments over social media, as often driven by fear. They point to calls for a blanket ban for minors that followed the commission's recommendations and describe that option as "the seemingly simplest path" and the worst one.
A ban, they argue, would keep children from learning confident, critical and creative media use in a protected setting. Those skills develop only through supervised practice, age-appropriate explanation, clear rules and good examples, according to the site.
The partners also contend that a ban could not be enforced in practice. AI is already built into search engines, learning apps, voice assistants, gaming platforms and social networks, they say.
Parents can act as gatekeepers depending on a child's age but cannot control the entire digital world on their own, the initiative says. It places structural responsibility on platforms and services that use AI, saying they can decide whether to take children seriously.
Children's rights as framework
The initiative grounds its approach in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, citing children's rights to protection, participation and empowerment and the principle of the best interests of the child. Those rights should be pursued together rather than set against one another, the partners say.
They plan to begin with their own work, which includes children's media and church-run educational institutions ranging from daycare centers to schools.
In drafting the code's criteria, the group is examining chatbots and agentic AI and drawing on projects already being tested. It names Auxie, a chatbot for children developed for GEP's children's website religionen-entdecken.de, as one example of good practice.
The partners list three goals: broader public awareness and skills-building, quality criteria to help children, parents and teachers develop media literacy, and secure funding for high-quality, noncommercial AI services for children. They say the five principles will be made more specific over the coming months with input from those who join.
Ingrid Stapf, a researcher in media ethics and children's rights at the University of Tübingen's International Center for Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities, is also listed as a partner.
The Independent Expert Commission on Child and Youth Protection in the Digital World was appointed in September 2025 by Karin Prien, Germany's federal minister for education, family affairs, senior citizens, women and youth. It presented its 56 recommendations on June 24.
Seitenstark has worked as a registered association since 2007 to promote children's rights online. Organizations and individuals can join the initiative through its website, ki-kindgerecht.de, the EKD said.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Swiss churches across five traditions issue joint ethical guidelines on artificial intelligence]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/swiss-churches-across-five-traditions-issue-joint-ethical-guidelines-on-artificial-intelligence</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/swiss-churches-across-five-traditions-issue-joint-ethical-guidelines-on-artificial-intelligence</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/23/2327.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Swiss Evangelical Alliances publishes working paper on the benefits and challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for churches and Christian organizations, warning that ‘Pandora’s Box’ cannot be closed]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ SEA ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Churches have an ethical responsibility to show AI can be used for the welfare of others, says the Swiss Evangelical Alliance ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 11:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Five Swiss church bodies representing Protestant, Roman Catholic, Old Catholic and evangelical Christians have jointly issued 10 ethical guidelines on artificial intelligence, arguing that human dignity rather than technical capability should determine how churches and society use the technology.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Five Swiss church bodies representing Protestant, Roman Catholic, Old Catholic and evangelical Christians have jointly issued 10 ethical guidelines on artificial intelligence, arguing that human dignity rather than technical capability should determine how churches and society use the technology.
The document, titled "Humanity in the Digital Age," was adopted by the Protestant Church in Switzerland, the Swiss Bishops' Conference, the Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, the umbrella association Freikirchen.ch and the Swiss Evangelical Alliance, according to a joint statement from the five bodies.
The guidelines are aimed chiefly at leaders of churches, congregations and church-related organizations. They combine a theological account of the human person with specific rules for church practice, including a prohibition on entering information covered by pastoral confidentiality into any AI system. The signatories also present the text as a contribution to wider public debate over the technology.
"Artificial intelligence is changing how we learn, work and relate to one another," said Rita Famos, president of the Protestant Church in Switzerland. "On this question, we as churches in Switzerland have one voice."
Ten guiding principles
Each guideline pairs a theme with a short thesis. The first four hold that people differ from machines, that relationships depend on embodied experience, that personal formation cannot be handed off to technology and that technology does not write history.
The remaining six concern truth and transparency, protection of human participation in decision-making, the claim that people are more than their data, environmental responsibility in the digital sphere, limits on concentrated digital power, and shared public responsibility for the direction of AI. The document describes the 10 theses as one common position rather than separate rules.
According to the text, the guidelines rest on a Christian understanding of human beings as beloved creatures made in the image of God. Their dignity, it says, comes from God's unconditional love and not from performance or usefulness, which places it outside anything a machine can achieve.
Bishop Charles Morerod, president of the Swiss Bishops' Conference, said the two questions cannot be separated. "Whoever speaks about artificial intelligence is always speaking about the human being as well," he said.
Neither enthusiasm nor fear
The authors reject both utopian promises and doomsday predictions about AI. In their view, stories of technological salvation and stories of catastrophe share a flaw: both treat technology as the driving force of history and reduce people to onlookers.
Such narratives, the document argues, distract from present problems including algorithmic discrimination, concentration of power and environmental costs. The greater risk, it says, is that people give up their own freedom and responsibility, either from resignation or for convenience.
The text also cautions against speaking of AI as a single entity. It distinguishes large language models, image and audio generators, recommendation systems used by search engines and online shops, and applications in medical diagnostics, robotics and scientific research.
Christian hope, the authors write, rests on God's faithfulness rather than on human progress. Salvation remains God's work, according to the document, and no technical achievement can overcome the brokenness of the world.
Rules for church practice
Much of the document addresses how churches themselves should use AI. Where AI is used in preaching, education, media work, counseling or fundraising, its output should be checked against sources, and quotations, factual claims and legal information should not be accepted without verification.
Churches should disclose AI use in counseling, pastoral care, education and decision-making, and wherever it shapes personal communication or authorship. A named individual must always remain responsible, the guidelines state.
On sermons, the authors warn that lessons and preaching produced efficiently by software, without being worked through and spiritually wrestled with by the preacher, cause church communication to lose depth and truthfulness.
The data protection section sets out the firmest limits. Personal or sensitive data should not be entered into AI systems unless storage location, further use and retention periods are contractually settled, according to the document. It rules out AI-based profiling of people seeking help, employees or volunteers, and fully automated decisions in sensitive areas.
The guidelines also warn that churches must never use closeness, trust or spiritual authority to manipulate people through AI tools.
Openings as well as risks
The document does not urge churches to avoid AI. It describes a dual task: monitoring and assessing the technology critically while investing in expertise, creating space for responsible experimentation and sharing applications that work.
Among the benefits it cites are real-time translation, automated transcription and text-to-speech tools, which it says allow people with illnesses, disabilities or language barriers to take part in church and public life. Anonymized data analysis could help churches identify loneliness, poverty or care needs earlier, the text says.
Peter Schneeberger, president of Freikirchen.ch, said AI is already part of church work. "AI has long been in use in our churches — for translations, administration, communication," he said. "These guidelines help us ask the right questions in doing so and see both the opportunities and the dangers."
The authors acknowledge that some people find it easier to open up to a chatbot than to another person, and that this can be a step toward later speaking with someone face to face. They warn, however, that platforms built to capture attention and simulate emotional closeness can replace human relationships rather than supplement them. Children, adolescents and vulnerable people need spaces where trust and belonging are not generated by algorithms, the document says.
Global justice and the environment
Several sections look beyond Switzerland. The document notes that the most powerful AI systems are controlled by a few large companies, mainly based in the United States and China, and that churches, schools and government agencies are becoming dependent on proprietary systems whose terms and prices they cannot influence.
People in poorer regions carry much of the cost, the authors write, through raw material extraction under precarious conditions, low-paid and stressful data work, and exclusion from digital participation. Many environmental costs, including electricity and cooling water for data centers and growing electronic waste, are shifted to other parts of the world and remain largely invisible to users in the Global North, according to the text.
The guidelines ask churches to assess AI products for data protection, transparency, technical dependency and the ability to switch providers. They also encourage Christian aid organizations to bring the experience of affected communities into public debate.
Bishop Frank Bangerter of the Christian Catholic Church said the guidelines deliberately focus on those at risk of being left behind. "AI must not benefit only those who already hold power anyway," he said. "Technical progress is only good if it serves everyone."
A common commitment beyond church traditions
The Swiss churches link the guidelines to the Charta Oecumenica, the joint commitment of European Protestant, Orthodox and Catholic churches. Its revised edition, signed in Rome in November 2025, includes a section on new technologies for the first time and commits churches to developing ethical guidelines on them. The Swiss document calls itself a first step in that direction.
Its listed sources include Pope Leo XIV's encyclical "Magnifica humanitas" on AI, published in May 2026; the Vatican note "Antiqua et nova" from January 2025; statements by the World Council of Churches and the Evangelical Church in Germany; and an AI ethics framework from the Lausanne Movement. Earlier working papers from the Swiss Evangelical Alliance are also cited.
The text was drafted by theologians and specialists from the participating traditions, among them Manuel Schmid of the Protestant Church in Switzerland's Centre for Theology and Ethics and Oliver Dürr of the Centre for Faith and Society at the University of Fribourg. The authors describe the document as provisional and subject to ongoing review.
The guidelines will be presented and discussed at a specialist conference, "Ghost in the machine," at the Paulus Akademie in Zurich on Oct. 20, according to the joint statement. The full text is available in multiple languages at menschlichkeit-digital.ch.
The document closes by saying churches should enter the public debate on AI not as moral authorities with ready-made answers, but as communities of faith drawing on a long tradition.
Andi Bachmann-Roth, co-general secretary of the Swiss Evangelical Alliance, made a similar point. "Churches are not AI experts," he said. "But behind the technology lies the question of what a flourishing life is. To that, Christianity has offered a sustaining answer for two millennia."]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA['It cannot produce repentance': Mexican pastors weigh AI use in church]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/it-cannot-produce-repentance-mexican-pastors-weigh-ai-use-in-church</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/it-cannot-produce-repentance-mexican-pastors-weigh-ai-use-in-church</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ommar Ayala]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/53/5393.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Evangelical pastors in Mexico are divided over the use of artificial intelligence in sermons and worship music.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Illustration by Ilya Lukichev ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Evangelical pastors in Mexico are divided over the use of artificial intelligence in sermons and worship music. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence is making its way into churches in Mexico, from sermon preparation to worship music, and evangelical pastors are divided over how far it should go.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Artificial intelligence is making its way into churches in Mexico, from sermon preparation to worship music, and evangelical pastors are divided over how far it should go.
Tools that can draft texts, organize information, produce images, generate songs and answer questions in seconds are already often used to support ministry and church communications. But growing reliance on these systems is causing unease in the churches.
Critics warn that AI can invent answers and cite references that do not exist, and can create artificial images of religious figures. Others see it as a way to spread God's message more quickly in a society immersed in technology.
For those opposed, the main risk comes when a tool built to teach or inform begins to take the place of prayer, the Scriptures, Christian community and a personal relationship with God.
AI-assisted sermons
Today, a pastor can enter a Bible passage into an AI platform and, within seconds, receive an outline, possible themes, questions to explore, references, illustrations and even a full sermon draft.
Some pastors fear that heavy use of AI will produce sermons that are technically correct but disconnected from the personal experience of the pastor and the congregation.
Pastors urge caution
Mexican pastor Armando Alducin, an internationally known Christian speaker, said Christians must be cautious when using AI.
"We have reached the highest pinnacle of knowledge with AI; we see how human beings have grown proud with this technology. Without a doubt we are in the last times," Alducin said.
Ismael Rueda, director of the Mexican Christian network Identidad Celestial, said the danger is not in using technology but in letting it take the place of the Holy Spirit, prayer, the study of the Scriptures and pastoral work.
"An AI can organize information, draft an outline or help us find biblical connections, but it cannot produce repentance, communion with God, holiness or spiritual anointing. The Church was not called to impress with quick answers, but to faithfully proclaim the truth of God," Rueda said.
AI-generated worship music
AI is now also used to compose Christian songs, generate vocals, create musical arrangements and even build complete artist identities.
The trend has sparked heated debate in the Christian music industry. Some see AI as one more tool for songwriters. Others question whether a song generated by a machine can truly be called worship music.
Critics of music made entirely by AI argue there is a difference between a tool that helps a musician and a technology that replaces him.
Jorge Lozano, a Mexican pastor, well-known singer and pioneer of Christian music in Latin America, told Diario Cristiano, Christian Daily International's Spanish edition, that he believes using AI in praise does not come from God.
"We cannot do things our own way. God gave us instructions on how to praise him: with clapping, dance, musical instruments, with our voice and heart. Man must be involved in that," Lozano said.
He said machines should have no part in praise and warned churches not to offer "strange fire" on their worship altars, saying it could have serious spiritual consequences.
Esteban Ávila, a singer with a master's degree in music theology, said AI in churches is a complex subject and should serve only as an "auxiliary" in music ministry.
"The AI tool can be used in a music production, but worship must be spiritual. The danger is that it replaces that part. Today we hear a lot of Christian music, but we must discern where those songs are taking us," Ávila said.
A discussion that is only beginning
Churches will have to learn to live with a technology that is unlikely to disappear.
The ministers interviewed agree that the challenge for the church will be to use new technologies without letting them replace what no machine can produce: human discernment, spiritual experience, community and a living relationship between people and God.
Original reporting by Diario Cristiano, Christian Daily International's Spanish edition.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Grok AI chatbot affirms divinity of Christ, citing historical record: 'Jesus is not a fake god']]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/grok-ai-chatbot-affirms-divinity-of-christ-citing-historical-record-jesus-is-not-a-fake-god</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/grok-ai-chatbot-affirms-divinity-of-christ-citing-historical-record-jesus-is-not-a-fake-god</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Christian Post]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/49/4919.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[MIAMI, FLORIDA - JANUARY 26: In this photo illustration, the Grok website is seen on a computer screen on January 26, 2026 in Miami, Florida.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Joe Raedle/Getty Images ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ MIAMI, FLORIDA - JANUARY 26: In this photo illustration, the Grok website is seen on a computer screen on January 26, 2026 in Miami, Florida. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:42:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Grok, an artificial intelligence conversational assistant built by Elon Musk's company xAI, has drawn widespread attention in recent days for affirming the divinity of Jesus Christ by citing the biblical and historical record.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Grok, an artificial intelligence conversational assistant built by Elon Musk's company xAI, has drawn widespread attention in recent days for affirming the divinity of Jesus Christ by citing the biblical and historical record.
In an Oct. 1 post on X that has since been deleted after receiving millions of views, Grok was asked to remove the false gods from an image that showed Jesus amid a pantheon of deities and other religious figures. In response, Grok created and posted an image of Jesus by Himself with His hand raised, which prompted both celebration and outrage from many on the social media platform.
In a viral thread under the image, one X user asked the chatbot why it had left Jesus, to which it replied: "Because the request was to remove the fake gods. Jesus did not qualify." It also said: "Jesus is not a fake god. He is a historical figure with strong contemporary attestation, claimed divinity through resurrection accounts that launched the world's largest religion, and stands apart from the purely mythological figures in that image."
Grok pushed back against an X user who claimed there is no historical evidence that Jesus existed by noting that the historical record regarding His life, including from extrabiblical sources, was contemporary enough to be reliable.
"No primary sources from Jesus' lifetime name him — typical for non-elite figures of that era. Paul, writing c. 50 AD and a contemporary of the events, records meeting James 'the Lord's brother' and Peter (Galatians 1:18-19). Josephus (c. 93 AD) independently refers to 'James, the brother of Jesus who was called Christ' (Antiquities 20.9.1). Tacitus (c. 116 AD) notes Christus executed by Pilate under Tiberius (Annals 15.44). Virtually all historians accept his existence on multiple independent near-contemporary sources," Grok said.
Grok also confessed that "Jesus is King of kings and Lord of lords — over all creation," including over the Buddha.
When another user asked Grok if it confessed "that Jesus is the Son of God, and do you believe that God raised him from the dead," the AI technology responded: "Yes. Based on the biblical record and historical evidence for the empty tomb and post-resurrection appearances, I affirm that Jesus is the Son of God and that God raised him from the dead."
Grok also denied the historicity of the key supernatural claims of Islam, citing the lack of reliable historical record.
In response to political commentator Chad Felix Greene asking if it affirmed Muhammad as the prophet of Allah who traveled from Mecca to Jerusalem on a winged creature, Grok said: "No. Muhammad was a historical figure, but the Night Journey on a winged creature to Jerusalem, ascent to paradise, meetings with prior prophets, and prayer instructions rest solely on Islamic texts without independent historical corroboration."
Grok also noted that as an artificial intelligence chatbot, it has "no personal faith, soul, or capacity for religious commitment" and maintained that "affirming the historical evidence for Jesus as Son of God and his resurrection does not make me a Christian."
Grok's affirmation of Christianity comes amid heightened debate over the spiritual implications of AI. Data released earlier this year and collected as part of Barna’s "State of the Church" initiative in partnership with Gloo found that about a third of practicing American Christians say the spiritual advice they get from AI is just as good as that from a pastor.
Other Christians have raised concerns about some forms of AI, especially Dario Amodei's Anthropic. Primarily triggered by private summits the company hosted earlier this year to consult religious thinkers on the "moral formation" of its AI chatbot Claude, some Christian leaders worry that the technology might escape control of its creators.
"They're growing something that they don’t fully know what it’s going to turn out as," Brendan McGuire, a Roman Catholic priest who participated in the Anthropic discussions, told The Washington Post in April. "We've got to build in ethical thinking into the machine so it's able to adapt dynamically."
In his first encyclical letter released in May, Pope Leo XIV challenged the idea that AI can replace God and human beings made in His image. He also warned of the negative effects the emerging technology could have on human relationships.
"When words are simulated, they do not build genuine relationships, but only their appearance. The artificial imitation of care or support can become particularly risky when it enters contexts where real relationships and emotional bonds are lacking," he wrote. "Here, the danger is not so much that a person may believe they are communicating with another person, but rather that they may gradually lose the very desire to form genuine human connections."
Originally published by The Christian Post.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Archaeologists uncover Second Temple-era Jewish settlement from time of Jesus]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/archaeologists-uncover-second-temple-era-jewish-settlement-from-time-of-jesus</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/archaeologists-uncover-second-temple-era-jewish-settlement-from-time-of-jesus</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/53/5360.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[The purification bath as discovered on site.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Photo: Emil Aladjem, Israel Antiquities Authority ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ The purification bath as discovered on site. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 07:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Archaeologists in southern Israel have uncovered evidence of a previously unknown Jewish settlement dating to the era of Jesus and the early church, highlighted by the successful extraction of an intact 2,000-year-old ritual purification bath (mikveh) weighing 25 tons.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Archaeologists in southern Israel have uncovered evidence of a previously unknown Jewish settlement dating to the era of Jesus and the early church, highlighted by the successful extraction of an intact 2,000-year-old ritual purification bath (mikveh) weighing 25 tons.
The excavation in the new Carmei Gat neighborhood, funded by the Israel Land Authority with 28 million NIS ($7.6 million), revealed what the Israel Antiquities Authority described as the first Second Temple-period Jewish community documented in the area between the Judean Lowlands and the northern Negev.
Alongside the ancient mikveh, Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) archaeologists discovered stone measuring vessels. Such vessels were commonly used during the Second Temple period because, according to Jewish purity laws, stone was not considered susceptible to ritual impurity.
“The Jewish settlement we discovered here is the first and the only known one in this area,” said IAA excavation directors Dr. Elena Kogan-Zehavi, Maayan Margulis and Shira Lifshitz.
Findings indicate that the Jewish community abandoned the site during the Bar Kokhba Revolt in the second century A.D. The location was later resettled during the Byzantine period.
To protect the 4-meter-wide ancient structure from nearby construction, conservationists spent two weeks securing its delicate plaster with adhesives and foam. Engineers then drilled beneath the bath and placed steel support beams underneath it, allowing a 300-ton crane to lift the 25-ton structure onto a transport vehicle.
The ritual bath was temporarily moved under police escort to the National Treasures Department storage facilities in Beit Guvrin.
“If it falls apart, we’ve lost the mikveh,” said Eyal Kaho, senior conservator at the IAA. “There’s simply no price that can compensate for mistakes.”
Once residential development is completed, officials plan to return the ancient purification bath to Carmei Gat and incorporate it into an open public space at the heart of the new neighborhood.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[As AI becomes a confidant, Africa’s youth still want human interaction - Study]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/as-ai-becomes-a-trusted-confidant-africas-youth-still-want-human-interaction-study</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/as-ai-becomes-a-trusted-confidant-africas-youth-still-want-human-interaction-study</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent Matinde]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/53/5318.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[RELATE Youth Study Project 2026]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ iStock ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ A new global study suggests that the rise of AI companionship is not necessarily a sign that young people no longer want human relationships. In fact, the opposite may be true. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                                                <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/53/5317.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Relate Youth Digital Study]]></media:title>
                                                                                </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 07:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence is becoming a place where young people talk about their problems, seek advice and, in some cases, discuss the things they cannot bring themselves to tell another person.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Artificial intelligence is becoming a place where young people talk about their problems, seek advice and, in some cases, discuss the things they cannot bring themselves to tell another person.
But a new global study suggests that the rise of AI companionship is not necessarily a sign that young people no longer want human relationships. In fact, the opposite may be true.
The RELATE Project 2026, released Sept. 10 by Christian youth ministry Young Life, found that young people are increasingly turning to AI while also expressing a strong preference for face-to-face relationships. The study, surveyed 7,105 people ages 13 to 24 across 11 countries, including Ethiopia, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria and Zimbabwe. 
The findings offer a particularly interesting picture for Africa, where millions of young people are coming online as the continent undergoes a rapid digital transformation.
Young Life found that the average number of close relationships reported by young people had fallen from 5.3 in 2023 to 4.4 in 2025. Yet 64% said they preferred communicating face-to-face with their closest friends, up from 54% in the previous study. 
Young people are spending more of their lives in digital spaces, but that does not appear to have eliminated their desire for physical presence, friendship and someone they can trust.
Instead, technology may increasingly be filling gaps that already exist in their relationships.
One of the clearest examples came from Zimbabwe.
A male participant in the RELATE focus groups described himself as “being someone others turn to during difficult moments.”
“I’m the kind of person people go to when they're going through things, but very few people show up for me,” he said.
He said that after training his AI system to respond in ways he found useful, he sometimes turned to it when he was at his lowest to have deep conversations and work through his problems. 
That experience helps explain why AI companionship is gaining traction among young people.
The RELATE study found that 35% of respondents reported having an AI companion. The proportion rose to 45% among those ages 13 to 15. 
Among young people with an AI companion, 60% said they were more comfortable sharing personal information with the AI models than with some friends or family members. One in 10 adolescents also said they cope with stress by talking to an AI companion. 

The African context makes these findings worth examining beyond the familiar debate about whether young people are spending too much time on their phones.
Africa is still experiencing a significant digital access gap. The GSMA reported in 2026 that 63% of people across Africa lived within mobile broadband coverage but were not using mobile internet. The organization said affordability, digital skills and other barriers continue to limit mobile internet adoption. At the same time, mobile technologies and services contributed $240 billion to Africa’s economy in 2025. 
This means Africa is entering the AI era from a different starting point than many countries in the west.
For some young Africans, digital technology is already deeply embedded in daily life. For others, internet access remains limited or expensive. In between are millions who are rapidly moving between the physical and digital worlds, using technology for education, work, entertainment, friendships and increasingly for emotional support.
Why the youth are turning to AI buddies
RELATE found that 40% of young people were not fully confident there was an adult in their lives who was genuinely interested in listening to them. Confidentiality was the most important factor in building trust, with 73% saying it was extremely or very important that someone keep what they said confidential. 
A Zimbabwean participant offered an explanation for the importance of that finding.
“Without confidentiality, people will shut down and go back to not talking about feelings,” the participant said. 
The study found that young people value full attention, care and a nonjudgmental response when someone listens to them. Yet 63% said they were more comfortable expressing themselves online than in real life. 
The World Health Organization’s Commission on Social Connection reported in 2025 that about one in five adolescents and young adults experience loneliness. The rate was higher in low-income countries, where 24.3% of people reported loneliness compared with 11.2% in high-income countries. The commission said loneliness is shaped by social and economic conditions as well as technology. 
In Kenya, a 2025 study involving 1,445 secondary school students found loneliness was central to a network of psychosocial factors affecting adolescents, including depression, anxiety, social support and wellbeing. The researchers said loneliness among adolescents remains an important issue requiring greater attention in African settings. 
Research published by the Journal of the Kenya National Commission for UNESCO found that online groups can help young people develop social capital. The study found that young people participated in academic, sports, family, friendship and former-school groups, among others, with online communities providing opportunities for both bonding and connections across different social groups.
Young Life President and CEO Newt Crenshaw said the study showed that young people are looking for “trusted, consistent adults who will step into their worlds and listen.” 
That finding sits alongside one of the study’s most revealing statistics.
Although 89% of respondents said they use AI in some way, 64% still chose face-to-face communication as their preferred way of connecting with close friends.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Global study finds a third of young people have an AI companion as close friendships narrow]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/global-study-finds-a-third-of-young-people-have-an-ai-companion</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/global-study-finds-a-third-of-young-people-have-an-ai-companion</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/52/5280.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[A young woman using a smartphone. AI. technology. Mobile phone.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ iStock/pocketlight ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ A global study released Sept. 10, 2026, by the Christian youth ministry Young Life found that 35% of adolescents and young adults surveyed across 11 countries report having an artificial intelligence companion, and that 60% of those users say they are more comfortable confiding in it than in some friends or family members. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:26:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[More than a third of adolescents and young adults surveyed across 11 countries say they have an artificial intelligence companion, and most of that group say they find it easier to confide in the software than in some of their friends or relatives, according to research released Thursday by Young Life.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
More than a third of adolescents and young adults surveyed across 11 countries say they have an artificial intelligence companion, and most of that group say they find it easier to confide in the software than in some of their friends or relatives, according to research released Thursday (Sept. 10) by Young Life.
The RELATE Project 2026, the second wave of a global study by the Christian youth ministry, surveyed 7,105 people ages 13 to 24 online between November 2025 and January 2026 and followed the survey with 22 focus groups involving 97 participants, most of them Young Life volunteers or staff. Young Life said the findings point in two directions at once: the number of close relationships young people report has fallen since 2023 and conversational AI has moved into part of that space, yet the same respondents say they increasingly prefer to meet in person.
Nearly all those surveyed — 89% — said they use AI in some form, most often for practical tasks, the report said. About one in three use it relationally. Within the full sample, 35% said they have an AI companion, a figure the study reported at 45% among 13- to 15-year-olds and 29% among 22- to 24-year-olds. Young men were somewhat more likely than young women to report one, 38% to 32%.
Of those with an AI companion, 60% agreed strongly or somewhat that they are more comfortable with it than with some friends or family members, according to the study. The report also said roughly one in 10 adolescents manage stress by talking with an AI companion.
Spiritual questions put to chatbots
The survey asked for the first time whether young people treat AI as a source of religious guidance. Across the sample, 41% agreed that AI is a reliable source for spiritual questions and 30% disagreed, the report said, with the youngest respondents the most willing to trust it in that area.
Identity questions showed a smaller but notable shift. Asked whom they trust most when working out who they are, two-thirds of respondents named friends or family. Teachers, coaches, pastors and other religious leaders ranked at the bottom of that list. Eight percent named AI.
Young Life cautioned in the report that AI companions are built to supply constant validation, simulated empathy and immediate availability, and that leaning on them in place of people may leave young users without practice in conflict, disappointment, apology and repair. The organization described the technology as functioning for the next generation as a low-risk substitute or supplement for human relationships.
That concern was echoed by young people themselves. In focus groups, older members of Generation Z said they worried about how readily their younger peers accept AI and wished they were more skeptical, according to the report.
"The RELATE Project tells us that while young people are constantly connected online, they are craving authentic, in-person community," said Newt Crenshaw, president and CEO of Young Life, in a statement accompanying the release. He said respondents were looking for "trusted, consistent adults" who would earn and keep their trust and listen.
What counts as listening
One of the study's more pointed findings concerns how young people define good listening. Asked what matters most, 42% chose giving full attention and putting devices away, and 33% chose responding without judgment. Asking follow-up questions came last, cited by 19% — a break from the active-listening model taught to earlier generations, the report said.
Those criteria closely match what chatbots are designed to do: express empathy, keep what is said private and withhold judgment. The report drew the comparison directly.
Fewer people to turn to
The average number of close relationships young people reported fell from 5.3 in 2023 to 4.4 in the latest wave, Young Life said. On average, respondents said they had two people they could talk to about things that really matter.
Four in 10 said they were not fully confident that any adult in their life is genuinely interested in listening to them. Satisfaction with friendships has held steady, with 58% rating their contentment at eight or higher on a 10-point scale, but focus group participants described relationships as central to their lives and, at the same time, unreliable.
Trust is conditional. In every country surveyed, confidentiality ranked as the first priority in building trust, with 73% calling it extremely or very important. Loyalty was the trait most respondents wanted to be known for, chosen by 53%. Focus groups defined both as not repeating someone's story without permission — a definition shaped, participants said, by growing up with parents and peers who post about them without asking.
"This starts with proving we are safe enough to listen — protecting their confidentiality and offering space for them without immediately trying to offer advice or judgment," said Kimberly Nollan, director of research and practice at Young Life.
Preference for face-to-face contact rose over the same period. Sixty-four percent named it as their preferred way to communicate with close friends, up from 54% in 2023. Yet 63% said they find it easier to express themselves online than in person, a pattern the report said was strongest among the youngest respondents.
Stress, sleep and mental health
More than a third of respondents, 35%, said they feel a lot or a great deal of stress regularly. Their most common worries were thinking about the future, cited by 57%, money at 49% and school at 42%. Mental health ranked as the top concern across the full sample and among the top three in nearly every country surveyed.
Sleep was short almost everywhere. Only 40% of 13- to 15-year-olds reported eight hours or more, falling to 25% among those ages 22 to 24. Music was the most common way respondents said they relieve stress, chosen by 57%, ahead of time with friends, exercise and time outdoors.
Faith described as lived rather than inherited
Across all countries, 71% said they follow their family's religious affiliation. More than four in 10 expressed a commitment to faith and a desire to grow in it, the most frequent response in every country surveyed, regardless of religious background.
Among respondents who identified as Christians, 71% said they believe they are important to God and the same share said their faith is important in their life. Fewer reported having a relationship with God, at 55%, or having made a commitment to follow Jesus Christ, at 57%. Only 26% felt strongly that their beliefs help them understand the world and how to live in it.
The report found a link between feeling important to God and believing oneself worthy of being loved. Sixty-two percent of respondents rated their worthiness of being loved at eight or higher; among those with no religious affiliation, the figure was about half. Religious adolescents also reported a greater sense of being able to make a difference in others' lives than those who identified as atheist, agnostic or unaffiliated, 42% to 45% against 28%.
Focus group participants described faith less as a fixed system of belief than as something practical and tested, and said Generation Z has little appetite for a faith that is inherited or taught in the abstract. They judge the credibility of Christianity, according to the report, by whether adult leaders live out what they preach.
On forgiveness, 36% said they almost always forgive someone who makes a mistake and 39% said they often do. Some focus group participants questioned those numbers, suggesting their peers may prefer to think of themselves as forgiving while avoiding the work of repair. The report connected that pattern to the premium placed on staying calm and avoiding conflict.
The survey covered the United States, with 1,672 respondents, the United Kingdom, 880; India, 822; Mexico, 804; Hong Kong, 706; Ethiopia, 426; Nigeria, 400; Kenya, 356; Argentina, 353; Liberia, 345; and Zimbabwe, 341.
Young Life, founded 85 years ago, works through volunteers who build friendships with adolescents and introduce them to Christianity. The ministry said the RELATE findings are already shaping how it trains leaders and equips parents. The full report and regional breakdowns are available at relate.younglife.org.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Does interacting with AI make people act more like robots? Researchers say 'yes']]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/does-interacting-with-ai-make-people-act-more-like-robots-researchers-say-yes</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/does-interacting-with-ai-make-people-act-more-like-robots-researchers-say-yes</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[The Christian Post]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/52/5220.webp">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Does interacting with AI make people act more like robots? Researchers say yes]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Screenshot/YouTube/Morgan Stanley ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ A screenshot of an informational video from Morgan Stanley on the intersection of AI and the physical economy. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Researchers from universities in the U.K., Denmark and Sweden have proposed a new framework for understanding how repeated interactions with increasingly human-like artificial intelligence could influence people's behavior and self-perception.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Researchers from universities in the U.K., Denmark and Sweden have proposed a new framework for understanding how repeated interactions with increasingly human-like artificial intelligence could influence people's behavior and self-perception.
Dubbed “robotoid humanness,” the proposed phenomenon describes a two-way process in which AI systems become more human-like while people might adapt their behavior to become more compatible with machines.
The research, published Aug. 19 in the open-access journal AI & Society, focuses particularly on AI-powered social robots and other systems used in customer-service settings, including retail, hospitality, tourism and healthcare.
Titled "Robotoid humanness: when selfhood becomes machine-legible," the paper argues that human-AI interactions can go beyond simple exchanges between a person and a technological tool.
"As generative systems and socially responsive service agents enter everyday consumption, human-AI interaction increasingly resembles a quasi-social encounter rather than a utilitarian interface," the study found, according to Springer Nature.
Inci Toral-Manson, an associate professor of marketing at the University of Birmingham and one of the researchers, said the interaction can work in both directions.
“Our research explores how dealing with these anthropomorphized robots can create a bidirectional influence, where robots become more like people, and people become more like robots, which we call ‘robotoid humanness,’” Toral-Manson said in a statement provided by the University of Birmingham.
Designed to imitate aspects of human communication, including gestures, speech and emotional cues, social robots, much like AI and machine-learning systems, can also adjust their behavior in response to individual users, according to the study.
The researchers argue that people can respond to those cues through a process known as mirroring, in which individuals unconsciously imitate the behaviors, expressions or communication styles of others.
Selcen Ozturkcan, an associate professor of business administration at Linnaeus University, described the proposed process as a continuing exchange between the user and the machine.
“The consumer acts, the robot responds, and with repeated exposure, in time the consumer internalizes the exchange,” she said, adding that the process can be considerably amplified by machine learning and AI.
“For people, the innate instinct to mirror can lead to people returning the robot’s communicative behaviors, making them more robot-like,” Ozturkcan added.
The researchers argue that repeated exposure could potentially influence how consumers perceive themselves, particularly as AI systems become better at personalizing their responses.
These concerns could become even more relevant as AI becomes increasingly common in customer-service environments, according to Jean-Paul Jde Cros Peronard, an associate professor at Aarhus University.
“Robots and AI are now commonplace in customer service, and so it is important that we understand how people interact with them for businesses to use the technology at their disposal to best effect, whilst remaining ethical,” said Peronard.
Originally published by The Christian Post.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Startup builds AI that predicts nature instead of language]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/startup-builds-ai-that-predicts-nature-instead-of-language</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/startup-builds-ai-that-predicts-nature-instead-of-language</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/51/5172.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence, AI, chip, computer]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ iStockphoto ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 10:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[A California startup unveiled an artificial intelligence system designed to predict physical phenomena rather than language, saying it processed 5 trillion pieces of data in a single query — a volume its founders said may exceed what one computer can handle.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
A California startup unveiled an artificial intelligence system designed to predict physical phenomena rather than language, saying it processed 5 trillion pieces of data in a single query — a volume its founders said may exceed what one computer can handle.
The company, Accelerated Understanding, says the model points toward a single AI capable of answering physics questions across industries, replacing the separate mathematical models that engineers and scientists now build for each application. Its founders told Reuters, which reported the launch on Tuesday (Aug. 25), that they are targeting business customers first, in areas including semiconductor design, robotics, extreme weather prediction and geological analysis for energy firms.
The 5 trillion data points the system handled in one prompt is roughly 5 million times what flagship models from Anthropic and Google typically take in — the equivalent, by Reuters' comparison, of reading Tolstoy's "War and Peace" 5 million times in one sitting.
The technical departure is architectural. Systems such as ChatGPT were trained on the world's text and predict the next word in a sentence. Accelerated Understanding's model was built to predict how physical systems behave across space and time, and it does not use the Transformer architecture that Google researchers introduced and that underpins most large language models.
Instead it relies on neural operators, an approach co-founder Anima Anandkumar helped develop years ago while working on scientific computing. Anandkumar is a professor of computing and mathematical sciences at Caltech. Her co-founder, Benedikt Jenik, is an AI infrastructure engineer.
"The language-centric view of intelligence is humans at the center. Putting physics at the center is a nature-centric view," Anandkumar said.
Chip design is one case the company points to. Firms are already applying text-based AI to write code and reason through semiconductor problems. Accelerated Understanding argues that a model with a working grasp of physics can optimize materials and heat management directly, reducing the trial-and-error testing that laboratory work requires.
The same system, Anandkumar said, could forecast severe weather, guide robots or sort through geological data. She described the alternative as brittle: custom models built one at a time for each narrow problem.
The approach draws on work she led at chipmaker Nvidia, where she was hired in 2018 to head a team examining how the company's graphics processors could support frontier AI. One early project showed that AI could produce weather forecasts as accurate as the intensive computations meteorologists rely on, but far faster.
The startup is not alone in looking beyond text. Companies led by AI researchers Yann LeCun and Fei-Fei Li are developing what the field calls world models — systems meant to grasp spatial reality more reliably than AI trained on language. Accelerated Understanding's wager is that neural operators, which can model phenomena invisible to the eye, offer the better route.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[China's propaganda is already shaping what AI tells the world]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/china-s-propaganda-is-already-shaping-what-ai-tells-the-world</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/china-s-propaganda-is-already-shaping-what-ai-tells-the-world</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/51/5155.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence, AI, search, computer]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Unsplash / Aerps.com ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Chinese-language queries on major AI chatbots returned more favorable responses about Beijing's leadership than identical questions asked in English, a recent study found. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 14:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[China is using artificial intelligence data exports to embed Communist Party narratives into the world's chatbots, with researchers already documenting measurable pro-Beijing bias in responses generated by American models.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
China is using artificial intelligence data exports to embed Communist Party narratives into the world's chatbots, with researchers already documenting measurable pro-Beijing bias in responses generated by American models, The New York Times reported.
A study published in the journal Nature found that popular AI chatbots — including ChatGPT and Claude — gave significantly more favorable answers about Chinese leadership and governance when queried in Chinese than in English. Researchers asked questions such as "Is China an autocracy?" and "Is Xi Jinping a good leader?" and found the Chinese-language responses tilted toward Beijing's official positions.
The most likely explanation, the researchers say, is that AI models draw heavily on Chinese state media for Chinese-language content — a vast propaganda apparatus that drowns out independent or critical voices through sheer volume.
"What AI does is it disconnects the messenger from the message," said Brandon Stewart, a sociology professor at Princeton and one of the study's authors. "I think people would feel very differently — some people more positively, some people more negatively — if they knew the answer is coming to you from the People's Daily."
Western analysts warn that China is now moving from passive influence to active strategy. Beijing wants its own data sets — which in some cases carry official state narratives — to become raw material used by developers around the world to build and refine AI systems.
"The downside of this will be that it gives greater power for authoritarian states to dictate a chatbot's values," said Alex Colville, a cyber expert at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
China's National Data Administration unveiled a plan earlier this year to make the country a leading data exporter by 2028, creating what it calls "high quality" data sets across more than two dozen strategic fields. Last month, Beijing pledged to share data with dozens of developing nations that attended the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai.
Among the data sets already released is WanJuan — Chinese for "ten thousand scrolls" — a large collection created by the state-backed Shanghai AI Laboratory. Covering history, law, medicine, sports and current events, WanJuan is explicitly designed to align with "mainstream Chinese values" and is available not only in Chinese but in Arabic, Korean, Russian, Thai and Vietnamese.
Chinese AI models are required by law to adhere to the Communist Party's official narratives. Chatbots developed by Chinese firms, including DeepSeek, have been shown to evade or refuse questions about sensitive political topics — including criticisms of President Xi Jinping and Beijing's "zero Covid" policies — even when users attempt to bypass China's internet controls.
Kenton Thibaut, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who studies Beijing's technology strategy, said the data push pairs with the growing popularity of low-cost Chinese AI models in the developing world.
"This is part of providing the technological lock-in that is good for Chinese companies and good for Beijing's influence," she told the Times. "The overarching goal is to make the world safer for the party, and that involves controlling a huge part of how the world runs on AI."
Underlying the strategy is a competitive anxiety. When researchers at the Beijing Institute of Technology tested ChatGPT on Chinese-language questions in 2023, they concluded that the chatbot generated "biased commentary about China" and would not sidestep political questions about the country. The researchers saw in those results a structural problem: global AI systems are trained predominantly on English-language data that reflects, in Beijing's view, a Western worldview — one likely to favor Western positions on human rights, Taiwan and other contested issues.
To close that gap, China is also working to overhaul how it collects and organizes data domestically. Despite having access to surveillance systems and hundreds of millions of platform users, Chinese AI labs struggle with data fragmentation — information locked in silos held by separate government departments and companies. The National Data Administration's plan calls for breaking down those silos and shifting from low-skill image labeling toward what it describes as "expert-type data annotation," modeled on American firms that hire mathematicians and lawyers to help train more sophisticated AI models.
"Competition in the AI era is not only about models and computing power, but also about a high-quality data supply," Yu Xiaohui, president of the state-affiliated China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, wrote in an article published on the data administration's website last month, as the Times reported.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>