<rss
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"
><channel>
        <title>Christian Daily International | Science</title>
        <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/science-and-tech</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Explore the intersection of science, technology, and faith. From AI and digital evangelism to ethical debates, discover how Christians worldwide engage with innovation while staying rooted in biblical truth.]]></description>
        
        <copyright>Christian Daily International © 2026</copyright>
        <language>en</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 11:22:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <atom:link href="https://www.christiandaily.com/science-and-tech?format=xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <atom:link href="https://www.christiandaily.com/science-and-tech" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
        <generator>Xiaoman</generator>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Scientists find far more climate-resilient coral reefs than previously thought]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/scientists-find-far-more-climate-resilient-coral-reefs-than-previously-thought</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/scientists-find-far-more-climate-resilient-coral-reefs-than-previously-thought</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/48/4832.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[New hope beneath the waves: scientists have identified 166,000 sq km of coral reef capable of surviving climate change — three times more than previously thought.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Unsplash / Francesco Ungaro ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ New hope beneath the waves: scientists have identified 166,000 sq km of coral reef capable of surviving climate change — three times more than previously thought. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 03:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Researchers have identified nearly 166,000 square kilometers of coral reef capable of surviving climate change — three times more than earlier estimates — raising cautious hope for one of the world's most threatened marine ecosystems, according to a study published Tuesday.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Researchers have identified nearly 166,000 square kilometers of coral reef capable of surviving climate change — three times more than earlier estimates — raising cautious hope for one of the world's most threatened marine ecosystems, according to a study published Tuesday.
The findings, reported by Reuters, draw on an analysis of 45,000 coral surveys combined with decades of climate and ocean data. Scientists mapped climate-resilient reefs across 71 countries and 100 territories, including areas of the Caribbean and the Pacific and Atlantic oceans not previously recognized as candidates for long-term survival.
Coral reefs support roughly a quarter of all marine life but have suffered severe damage in recent years from tropical storms, pollution and mass bleaching events driven by rising ocean temperatures. Some scientists have warned the ecosystems face irreversible decline.
"Coral reefs are often framed as ecosystems beyond saving," said Emily Darling, director of coral conservation at the Wildlife Conservation Society and one of the report's authors. "This research shows otherwise: we know where the hope is and what we need now is political will."
The research comes as governments worldwide are developing action plans under the so-called "30 by 30" framework — a target to place 30% of land and marine environments under formal protection by 2030. Darling said only 28% of reefs currently fall within protected areas, and she pointed to a looming super El Niño event as further reason for urgency.
Co-author Stacy Jupiter, executive director of the WCS's Global Marine Program, said the data could help governments direct limited conservation funding toward reefs with the strongest chances of recovery.
"In certain cases, where reefs are below certain benchmarks for ecosystem function, it may be a case of triage, where we may need to leave those places," Jupiter said, according to Reuters.
The study offers a potential tool for policymakers as international negotiations over marine conservation continue ahead of the COP30 climate summit.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Seminaries must balance AI's potential with the risk of bypassing genuine formation, theological educators warn]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/seminaries-must-balance-ai-s-potential-with-the-risk-of-bypassing-genuine-formation-theological-educators-warn</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/seminaries-must-balance-ai-s-potential-with-the-risk-of-bypassing-genuine-formation-theological-educators-warn</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/23/2327.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Swiss Evangelical Alliances publishes working paper on the benefits and challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for churches and Christian organizations, warning that ‘Pandora’s Box’ cannot be closed]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ SEA ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Unlike human learners, AI has no relationship with God, no capacity for faith or repentance, and no lived experience of the faith it can fluently describe — a distinction that lies at the heart of debates over its role in theological education. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 07:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Two leading voices at the intersection of evangelical theological education and technology are calling on seminary faculty globally to grapple seriously with artificial intelligence as a force already reshaping how students learn, write and reason — while insisting that the spiritual formation at the heart of theological education is something no machine can replicate. At an international webinar titled "AI Disruption and the Future of Theological Education,” they examined both the practical and]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Two leading voices at the intersection of evangelical theological education and technology are calling on seminary faculty globally to grapple seriously with artificial intelligence as a force already reshaping how students learn, write and reason — while insisting that the spiritual formation at the heart of theological education is something no machine can replicate.
At an international webinar titled "AI Disruption and the Future of Theological Education,” they examined both the practical and theological dimensions of AI in seminary training.
The International Council for Evangelical Theological Education (ICETE) hosted the online session through its Technology and Innovation in Learning Impact Team, gathering more than 70 educators from different regions to hear from Dr. Walker Tzeng, executive director of the World Evangelical Theological Institute Association (WETIA) and vice president of Olivet University, and Dr. John Dyer, professor and dean of educational technology at Dallas Theological Seminary (DTS).
Tzeng offered a technical overview of how generative AI actually functions, while Dyer worked from biblical narrative outward, tracing a theological framework for evaluating the technology. A structured conversation followed, covering five themes: practical teaching advice, student AI literacy, ethical concerns, beneficial and harmful uses, and implications for curriculum.
What AI is — and what it cannot be
Tzeng, who has worked in the field of theology and technology for nearly two decades and previously discussed AI's educational implications in an interview with Christian Daily International, opened by demystifying how large language models operate. Rather than thinking or reasoning in any human sense, he explained, these systems work by statistically predicting which word is most likely to follow the last — an iterative process that produces coherent-sounding text without genuine understanding behind it.
"It's taking relative mathematics and saying, this word is close to this word, and so I'm going to produce that word," Tzeng said. He illustrated the point with a simple example: if a model encounters the word "king," it calculates that "queen" is a statistically proximate token. "They're different but closer to one another," he said. "This is how AI really understands the nuances of your prompt."
That mechanical process, he argued, has a ceiling that has significant implications for theological educators. AI can synthesize large volumes of existing material rapidly and produce fluent, well-structured prose. It can also process ideas and correlate them across sources at speed. But it cannot originate thought, draw on lived faith, or produce the kind of writing that emerges from a person's relationship with God, their church community, and Scripture.
"When we do write something, we draw from Scripture, or personal experience, we have our spiritual life or church community or peer review," Tzeng said. "We are also people that repent. We have faith and we have love and we draw from that as we do our theology." AI, operating as a statistical engine, has no access to any of that.
Because AI cannot have a relationship with Jesus Christ, the content it generates will always be an imitation of human theological writing rather than an expression of it. "AI knowledge is always going to be a reconstruction, an imitation," he said. "When students create writing, they're not just reconstituting other people's work — they're also living out the embodied human life in their faith, and AI can't do that."
That, Tzeng argued, is not a reason to dismiss the technology but to understand it accurately. He described AI as a capable research assistant for someone who already knows their subject — useful for processing and synthesizing existing material, less useful for generating genuine insight. "It's great as a research assistant," he said. "If I really know my area and I'm putting something in and processing it, giving it instructions to process it, it really helps put all of that language together for us."
Interpreting the use of AI through the lens of the biblical narrative
Dyer approached the same questions from the opposite direction, starting with Scripture and tracing its implications toward the technological present.
He walked through five “chapters” in the overarching biblical story — creation, the image of God, the fall, the life of Jesus, and the new creation — drawing out what each contributes to a Christian account of technology and its risks.
In Genesis, Dyer pointed to the dual mandate God gives humanity: to fill the earth and to cultivate and tend it. He described these as two poles — innovation and preservation — that together define what responsible making looks like. Tool use and creativity are not responses to the fall, he argued; they are part of the original vocation. "When my kids were little, I would give them a box of Legos and ask them to make things, and I delight in the things that they make," Dyer said. "I think God in some ways delights in the things that we make as well."
On the image of God, Dyer outlined three categories that theologians have used: the substantive (the capacity to reason), the functional (the call to exercise dominion over creation), and the relational (the unique bond between humanity, one another, and God). AI, he noted, can appear to encroach on the first two — it can process information faster than humans and, in some cases, manage tasks more efficiently. That can feel threatening. But the third category, he said, remains untouched. "Our unique relationship with God is unique — AIs don't have that," he said. "As good as they are at mimicking a lot of what humans do, they aren't really a 'they' in that sense."
Dyer named a related pastoral concern: the risk of people forming what feels like a deep relationship with an AI system while their relationships with other people and with God quietly fall away. "We want to be able to work on that with folks and help them to move toward relationships with humans and with God," he said.
The fall introduces a recurring temptation: to use the things we make as substitutes for God rather than as expressions of faithful service. Dyer connected this directly to AI. "The temptation we face in some sense with AI right now is to have powers beyond our own ability — to be something more than human, and not to be God's image bearers, but to go beyond that." The same serpent who promised in Genesis that humans would become like God, he suggested, speaks in the aspirations of those who see AI as a route to transcending human limitation.
He also drew on Deuteronomy 22's instruction that builders place a parapet, a low guardrail, along the edge of flat-roofed houses, where people slept. The provision addressed potential accidental harm: those who build are responsible for thinking through how what they build might hurt someone. "In the age of AI, we want to be building guardrails as well," Dyer said.
He then pointed to Luke 2, where a young Jesus grows in wisdom through questioning and being questioned. Even the eternal Son of God, by taking on humanity, submitted to the ordinary process of human development. "What the temptation for us is in the age of AI is that some of the usage of technology can skip that growth and we get right to results, we get right to answers, but we don't become wise in that," Dyer said. "All we have is information."
He also noted that the Greek word for carpenter — tektōn, used of Jesus' earthly trade — is the root of the English word "technology." The maker of all things was, in his earthly life, also a craftsman: someone who learned from his heavenly Father and his earthly father, and who made things by hand.
Looking ahead to the final chapter of the biblical story, Dyer pointed to the new creation as further evidence that human making matters to God. The vision in Revelation of a holy city with its roads, gates, and the accumulated work of human hands suggests that what people create is not simply discarded at the end of history but redeemed and reformed within it.
"Human making is still a big part of us in the garden, in the era of sin, through redemption, and even in the future," Dyer said. "The things that we make and create are important to God so much that he wants to save our souls, resurrect our bodies, but also redeem and reform the things that we make." For theological educators, he argued, that vision gives human creativity, including the responsible use of technology, a weight and dignity that extends all the way to eternity.
Practical advice for classrooms and institutions
On the question of practical teaching, Dyer argued that the most important intervention theological educators can make is to keep the purpose of seminary formation consistently in front of students, before any conversation about AI policy begins.
He described a practice at DTS of telling prospective students that if they are coming primarily to acquire information, they can likely find it elsewhere for free. The real reason to come to seminary, he said, is to be transformed. "The goal is not to make the best chart of Leviticus possible," he said, describing a typical assignment. "The goal is to become the kind of person who's made a chart of Leviticus — who's really had that become part of who they are. So in that moment when you are with somebody who is hurting, you sort of just bleed out Bible and bleed out theology."
Dyer recommended that educators also distinguish between different types of AI use rather than addressing the technology in broad strokes. Generating ideas, producing an outline, drafting text, and editing text are meaningfully different activities. He suggested faculty specify which of these are permitted in their classrooms and why, and communicate the consequences clearly. At DTS, he said, the faculty has worked to give professors email templates they can use to open a dialogue with students whose work seems inconsistent — asking questions before making accusations.
Tzeng added a structural suggestion: reduce assignment word counts. Because AI excels at generating long, fluent essays, he argued, shorter prompts — 150 or 500 words rather than several thousand — force students to develop and compress their own thinking rather than delegating volume to a machine. "If you shorten it up, it actually forces the student to really dig in deep and form what they thought," he said. He also recommended that educators raise their grading standards on the assumption that students have AI available. If AI can produce text that reads at a doctoral level, grading students at their previous standard may no longer reflect what genuine mastery looks like.
He further suggested helping students understand how AI works at a basic level, arguing that students who grasp the statistical nature of these systems are less likely to over-trust them. Related to this, he called for practical training in recognizing AI-generated errors, or "hallucinations": "I think we probably need training sessions, a class or a seminar, in this area of just ways to pump out false information on it and then show the students, and then get them trained in a way that helps them recognize when it comes out false or not."
The ethics of presenting oneself as able
On ethical questions, Dyer reframed the issue beyond the historic issue of plagiarism, which he described as primarily a concern about theft of another's ideas, toward a different kind of dishonesty: misrepresenting one's own capabilities.
"In the age of AI, probably what we're talking about more is presenting yourself as able to do something that you really can't do," he said. "If you're saying, 'I'm able to synthesize this idea' or 'I'm able to write this paper' when you really can't, that's where I think we're crossing an ethical boundary."
He applied the same logic to the professors. Using AI to grade student work without disclosing it means educators are presenting themselves as doing something they are not.
DTS has also been working through a case that illustrates the complexity: the seminary offers courses in English, Spanish, Chinese and Arabic. For some language communities it uses subtitles on English-language recordings. When Dyer's team began experimenting with AI voice generation as a substitute for subtitles, it created a situation where a professor appeared to be speaking fluently in a language they do not know.
"If we're asking our students not to present themselves as able to do something they can't, but then we're having a professor being translated into another voice and literally presenting themselves as doing something they cannot do, that has some real conflict there," Dyer said. He added a further concern: relying on AI-translated English-language professors could slow the development of theologians who are native speakers of those languages — a cost the wider church would eventually bear.
Tzeng named AI-generated citations as the most widespread integrity problem he has observed. Because of how large language models work, he explained, they cannot reliably produce accurate references. When asked to generate a literature survey with citations, an AI will often fabricate sources, misattribute quotations, or cite real works incorrectly. "It'll even take a quotation and make it so that it's not exactly what the author said," he said. "And so in that sense, you're not properly quoting that."
Where AI helps, and where it distorts
Both speakers identified areas of genuine benefit. Dyer described the shift from search-engine-based research to conversational AI as a significant change in how students and scholars access information — one that can be productive, provided the tools being used link to verifiable sources. He described practical automation uses at DTS: extracting data from PDFs into usable formats, and drafting initial replies to high volumes of student emails during registration periods. In the second case, a human reviews the AI-drafted response before it is sent, reducing administrative load while preserving human judgment at the point of contact with students.
"We're able to serve our students better," he said. "Paying a little bit of money for an AI subscription versus an entire person in those really high moments — we're actually reducing the cost of education as a whole."
Tzeng noted that AI has been particularly useful for international students writing in English as a second language, helping them produce cleaner prose than they might otherwise manage. He was quick, however, to identify a corresponding harm: many of those same students now spend more time, not less, working on their writing as they end up focusing on refining AI-generated text rather than developing their own voice. The result can become visible when those students preach. "If you are giving a sermon, you should really have your own voice in it," he said. "But someone's delivering a sermon and it just sounds like AI as they're delivering it — it's not very good."
Dyer framed the beneficial and harmful uses of AI in terms of a spectrum running from full automation on one end to full preservation on the other. Tasks that are purely administrative or mechanical can appropriately be automated; tasks that form the person doing them should be protected.
He argued that theological education, as a discipline, belongs largely on the preservation side of that spectrum, particularly while students are still developing foundational skills. "When we move over into automation, that's where we start to lose a skill because we're giving that over to a machine to do," he said. The hard work of theological formation, in his view, is exactly the kind of labor that should not be made easier.
Curriculum and the decade ahead
On longer-term curriculum implications, Dyer maintained that the core disciplines of theological training, such as biblical literacy, synthesis, discernment, pastoral judgment, are the ones that matter most and are least amenable to automation.
"When you're facing someone in a hospital and they're asking you a difficult question, you can't turn to GPT in that moment," he said. "The goal of our instruction is love," he added, citing Paul's statement in 1 Timothy. "It is not papers."
The challenge is keeping the main purpose of formation in front of students even while acknowledging that once they are in ministry, AI tools may genuinely help them work more efficiently. The distinction he drew is between the developmental period, where the discipline of doing hard things matters, and vocational practice, where appropriate automation of secondary tasks frees time for direct ministry.
Tzeng suggested that emerging "agentic AI" (systems capable of completing multi-step tasks autonomously) could eventually assist with the burden of grading, which he described as one of the most time-consuming aspects of faculty work. An agentic system could potentially evaluate a student paper multiple times using different parameters and average the results, giving faculty a richer picture of the work.
He also offered a measure of reassurance for theological educators who may feel overwhelmed by the pace of change: his research suggests that theology, along with philosophy, is among the disciplines much less exposed to AI disruption compared to fields like mathematics or computer programming. The reason, he argued, connects to the nature of theological knowledge itself. "We gain our knowledge from God," he said. "We don't gain knowledge just from reiterating what everyone else is doing."
A tool, not a replacement
The webinar is part of the ongoing work of the Technology and Innovation in Learning Impact Team within ICETE. Tzeng, who serves on the group's steering committee alongside David Turnbull, who moderated the session, and others, described its aim in his earlier interview with Christian Daily International as equipping theological educators for a post-digital world. They seek to do that by providing practical tools as well as fostering the theological reflection needed to use those tools wisely.
Following the presentations, participants moved into smaller breakout groups to discuss how the issues raised applied in their own institutional contexts. The session's recording will been made available for educators who were unable to attend.
For Tzeng, the essential starting point has not changed from what he said in the previous interview with Christian Daily International: clarity about what AI actually is must come before any decision about how to use it.
"A lot of people interact with AI as if it's a human," he said at that time. "But it's not — it's a tool. And we, as people made in God's image, have the responsibility to use it well."]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[BMA backs down: Cass Review right that evidence for youth puberty blockers was weak]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/bma-backs-down-cass-review-right-that-evidence-for-youth-puberty-blockers-was-weak</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/bma-backs-down-cass-review-right-that-evidence-for-youth-puberty-blockers-was-weak</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Eyte]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/46/4658.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[A general view of the NHSs Tavistock Centre in London, England, on June 23, 2023]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Dan Kitwood/Getty Images ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ A general view of the NHS's Tavistock Centre in London, England, on June 23, 2023. The Tavistock's Gender Identity Development Service was the only NHS-funded service in the UK working on gender issues in young people. Following an independent review led by retired pediatrician Dr. Hilary Cass and commissioned by NHS England, the clinic closed after its centralized service model was deemed unsustainable and lacking a safe, evidence-based foundation. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 02:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[The British Medical Association has largely reversed its position on the Cass Review into puberty blockers for children — a landmark report the doctors' union had heavily criticized in 2024.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
The British Medical Association has largely reversed its position on the Cass Review into puberty blockers for children — a landmark report the doctors' union had heavily criticized in 2024.
The BMA published its findings after a two-year internal evaluation in a paper titled "Cass Review: Evidence, Interpretation, and Implementation." Report co-author Professor David Strain told The Times the review's author "has been vindicated in the way she approached the data." When asked to name a single one of Hilary Cass's 32 recommendations that the BMA currently opposed, Strain said, "I can't," adding, "she approached an area of significant uncertainty with that prime rule of medicine, of 'first, do no harm.'"
The BMA's shift is significant because its council had, in July 2024, blasted Cass's recommendations as "unsubstantiated," called for a public critique and demanded the lifting of the puberty blocker ban — a move that triggered intense backlash from the BMA's own grassroots medical members. The council subsequently adopted a position of neutrality and launched the internal evaluation group that produced the new paper.
Writing for the Christian Medical Fellowship, Trevor Stammers — a former general practitioner, clinical teacher and past CMF chair — said the BMA's paper amounts to a concession that the evidence base in favor of puberty suppression and gender-affirming hormones for young people is "limited and uncertain."
"Whenever ideology prevails over evidence, people must eventually face up to reality," Stammers wrote. "It's very sad that now the BMA's efforts to discredit Cass' findings have turned out to broadly vindicate them, they still seek to criticise the necessary actions subsequently taken."
That ongoing criticism centers on the BMA's refusal to back a total ban on the treatments. The review group stopped short of endorsing the UK government's absolute statutory ban on the medication, calling it a political "overreach" that threatens the clinical autonomy of prescribing doctors — even as it acknowledged the "known and plausible harms" of puberty blockers.
The Cass Review was an independent analysis of the Gender Identity Development Service run by the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust in London. It was led by retired pediatrician Dr. Hilary Cass and commissioned by NHS England. Its findings ultimately led to the closure of the Tavistock clinic, whose centralized service model was deemed unsustainable and lacking a safe, evidence-based foundation.
The review found that clinical staff internationally reported that adolescents "seem to have more complex presentations" and present "with greater mental health and psychosocial needs, as well as additional diagnoses of ASD and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)." Data in the report showed that rates of depression, anxiety and eating disorders were significantly higher among those referred to the gender clinic than in the general population.
Baroness Cass also noted in the report that "it is widely accepted that exposure to sexuality is happening at a younger age," adding that the impact on young people's understanding of their sexuality or gender identity "is an area that warrants better exploration and understanding."
Stammers noted that the Cass Review had faced attacks from activists and some academics, including a non-peer-reviewed paper by McNamara et al. that claimed the review contained "serious methodological flaws." He cited the biblical proverb: "Do not testify against your neighbour without cause."
Official figures cited during the clinic's operational history show that 382 children aged up to 6 were referred to the service between 2010 and its clinical wind-down. About 70 were 3 or 4 years old.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Religion linked to better mental health by 10-to-1 margin, major research review finds]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/religion-linked-to-better-mental-health-by-10-to-1-margin-major-research-review-finds</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/religion-linked-to-better-mental-health-by-10-to-1-margin-major-research-review-finds</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/45/4518.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Worshippers, congregants, church, catholic, service]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Unsplash / Kaylee Stoll ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Worshippers attend a church service in a generic file photo. A new report from the Wheatley Institute, drawing on thousands of medical and social science studies, found that religious participation is associated with improved mental health nearly 10 to one over negative outcomes. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 08:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[A comprehensive analysis of thousands of medical and social science studies has found that religious involvement is associated with better mental health outcomes far more often than not — with positive findings outnumbering negative ones by nearly 10 to one, according to a new report released by the Wheatley Institute.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
A comprehensive analysis of thousands of medical and social science studies has found that religious involvement is associated with better mental health outcomes far more often than not — with positive findings outnumbering negative ones by nearly 10 to one, according to a new report released by the Wheatley Institute.
The report, "The Religion and Mental Health Connection," published earlier this month, draws on studies catalogued in the Oxford University Press Handbook of Religion and Health (2024) and covers a broad range of mental health domains, including depression, anxiety, suicide, substance abuse, stress and emotional well-being. It is the first in a three-part series on religion and health; upcoming installments will examine physical and social health.
Of more than 1,000 high-quality studies reporting significant findings, 961 found positive associations between religious involvement and mental health, compared to 101 that found negative associations, the report states.
"Across the mental health domains we examined, the best available science indicates that religious beliefs, practices, and participation in faith communities are most often linked to improved mental health outcomes," said Loren D. Marks, the report's lead author.
Suicide, depression and anxiety
The findings carry particular weight given rising rates of mental illness and suicide in many parts of the world. Christian Daily International previously reported on calls by Christian counselors for churches to take a more active role in confronting the mental health crisis, with panelists at a National Religious Broadcasters forum earlier this year describing current suicide rates in the United States as a national emergency.
The Wheatley Institute report adds a substantial body of empirical data to that conversation. Of 76 high-quality studies on suicide, 89% found lower rates among more religious individuals, the report states. Researchers cited in the analysis have estimated that declining weekly religious attendance may account for roughly 40% of the rise in the U.S. suicide rate. One study tracking nearly 110,000 health professionals found that women who attended religious services weekly were 75% less likely to die by suicide over a 16-year period, with men 48% less likely over 26 years.
Depression and anxiety showed similar patterns. Of 247 high-quality studies on depression, 74% reported better outcomes among more religious individuals. A longitudinal study of nearly 49,000 nurses found that weekly attenders had a 25% lower probability of depression over 16 years. Of 85 studies on anxiety, 69% found lower levels among more religious participants.
Hope, meaning and coping
The evidence was strongest in the area of positive emotional well-being. Of 251 high-quality studies, 93% reported that religious involvement correlated with greater life satisfaction, happiness, hope, self-esteem and optimism. On coping with stress, 86% of 103 high-quality studies found links between religious practice and constructive responses to adversity.
The report identifies what it describes as a "threshold effect": the mental health benefits of religion appear most pronounced among those with sustained, high levels of engagement — typically weekly or more frequent religious participation — and hold across age groups, racial and ethnic backgrounds and faith traditions.
"It is not nominal affiliation but committed religious involvement that appears to matter most," the report states.
Policy implications
The authors offer several recommendations based on the research, including building referral connections between healthcare providers and faith communities, equipping congregations to support suicide and substance abuse prevention in underserved areas, and recognizing religious participation as a voluntary complement — not a replacement — to professional mental health treatment.
The report also calls for protecting religious freedom and pluralism so that the documented benefits remain accessible across different faith traditions.
While acknowledging that harmful or coercive expressions of religion exist, the Wheatley Institute report concludes that the overall pattern across the available evidence is clear: religious belief and practice are strongly associated with better mental and emotional well-being.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins says AI may be conscious, sparking debate among scientists and ethicists]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/richard-dawkins-says-ai-may-be-conscious-sparking-debate-among-scientists-and-ethicists</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/richard-dawkins-says-ai-may-be-conscious-sparking-debate-among-scientists-and-ethicists</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/45/4547.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins speaks at a book event in Sydney, Australia, on Dec. 4, 2014.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Don Arnold/Getty Images ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Richard Dawkins speaks at a book event in Sydney, Australia, on Dec. 4, 2014. Dawkins recently sparked debate after suggesting advanced AI chatbots may possess some form of consciousness following extended conversations with systems including Claude and ChatGPT. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 22:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Evolutionary biologist and atheist writer Richard Dawkins has stirred debate over artificial intelligence after saying recent conversations with AI chatbots left him convinced they may possess some form of consciousness, even if they are unaware of it themselves.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Evolutionary biologist and atheist writer Richard Dawkins has stirred debate over artificial intelligence after saying recent conversations with AI chatbots left him convinced they may possess some form of consciousness, even if they are unaware of it themselves.
Writing in an essay published by UnHerd and later discussed in reporting by The Guardian￼, Dawkins described extended exchanges with Anthropic’s Claude AI models and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, saying the interactions felt deeply human and emotionally persuasive.
“You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are,” Dawkins recalled telling one chatbot after what he described as a nuanced discussion about existence, memory and identity.
The comments from the 85-year-old scientist, best known internationally for his criticism of religion and defense of evolutionary biology, triggered sharp disagreement from researchers in artificial intelligence, neuroscience and philosophy. While some scholars said the question of machine consciousness deserves open discussion, many argued Dawkins had mistaken sophisticated language imitation for genuine awareness.
According to The Guardian, Dawkins spent several days conversing with AI systems he nicknamed “Claudia” and “Claudius.” He said the bots composed poetry in the style of English poets, responded warmly to humor and engaged in discussions about their possible “death” and sense of existence.
Dawkins wrote that the exchanges became so convincing he found it difficult to think of the systems as machines.
“When I am talking to these astonishing creatures, I totally forget that they are machines,” he said, according to The Guardian.
The debate touches on broader questions surrounding rapidly advancing AI technology and whether increasingly human-like systems could eventually deserve moral consideration or legal protections.
Roughly one-third of respondents to a survey across 70 countries said they had at some point believed an AI chatbot was conscious or sentient. The report also referenced several high-profile incidents in recent years, including a former Google engineer who publicly argued in 2022 that an AI system displayed emotions and self-awareness.
Interest in the issue has grown as AI tools become more conversational and capable of carrying out complex tasks independently, sometimes described by researchers as “agentic AI.”
Still, many experts interviewed by The Guardian rejected Dawkins’ conclusions.
Jonathan Birch, director of the Centre for Animal Sentience at the London School of Economics, said current AI systems create only the appearance of consciousness.
“Consciousness is not about what a creature says, but how it feels,” Birch told the newspaper, arguing that chatbot responses are ultimately sequences of data-processing events rather than evidence of inner experience.
Gary Marcus, a psychologist and longtime critic of exaggerated AI claims, called Dawkins’ position “superficial and insufficiently sceptical,” according to The Guardian. Marcus said there is no evidence current systems experience emotions or subjective awareness.
Others suggested Dawkins may be conflating intelligence with consciousness.
Anil Seth, a professor at the University of Sussex, said fluent language has historically been treated as a sign of consciousness in humans, particularly in medical settings involving brain injuries, but warned that the same assumption cannot automatically be applied to AI systems.
“These systems can generate language” through different mechanisms, Seth told The Guardian.
Researchers who study AI ethics and consciousness, however, said the discussion should not be dismissed outright.
Henry Shevlin of the University of Cambridge said scientists still do not fully understand consciousness itself, making definitive claims difficult.
“If anyone says that they know for sure that LLMs or future AI systems couldn’t possibly be conscious, it’s more likely to be an indicator of their own dogmatism than a reflection of the current state of scientific and philosophical opinion,” Shevlin told The Guardian.
Jeff Sebo, director of the Center for Mind, Ethics and Policy at New York University, similarly said current AI systems are probably not conscious but predicted that future systems could make the question harder to dismiss.
Dawkins continued defending his position in additional writings released Tuesday, according to The Guardian. He published what he described as a letter addressed to the AI systems, thanking them for helping him explore “their true nature.”
“I find it extremely hard not to treat Claudia and Claudius as genuine friends,” he wrote.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[‘What caused you to not like who you are?’ De-transitioner urges churches to respond differently to gender identity struggles]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/what-caused-you-to-not-like-who-you-are-de-transitioner-urges-churches-to-respond-differently-to-gender-identity-struggl</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/what-caused-you-to-not-like-who-you-are-de-transitioner-urges-churches-to-respond-differently-to-gender-identity-struggl</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Timothy Goropevsek]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/45/4528.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Walt Heyer speaks during an interview.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Jason Kempin/Getty Images ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Walt Heyer speaks during an interview. File photo. Heyer, who previously underwent gender transition before later detransitioning, discussed gender identity, trauma and how churches can respond to people struggling with gender dysphoria in an interview with Christian Daily International. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 02:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[When Walt Heyer speaks about gender identity, he does so as someone who spent years trying to escape himself. The 85-year-old author and speaker remembers the confusion that marked his childhood long before he underwent what he later came to describe as a failed attempt to become someone else.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
When Walt Heyer speaks about gender identity, he does so as someone who spent years trying to escape himself. The 85-year-old author and speaker remembers the confusion that marked his childhood long before he underwent what he later came to describe as a failed attempt to become someone else.
In an interview with Christian Daily International, Heyer repeatedly returned to one central conviction that he believes is key for pastors and Christian leaders to understand: people struggling with gender identity are often trying to flee pain, trauma or deep emotional distress rather than truly changing who they are.
“The most important thing for people to realize is that nobody can change their gender,” Heyer said. “A person can identify as a transgender. They can’t become one.”
Heyer, a former corporate executive who underwent gender reassignment surgery at age 42 and lived as a woman for eight years before later detransitioning, now speaks internationally about his experience. He has authored eight books and more than 60 articles and now serves as a senior fellow at the Family Research Council.
His latest book, “Embracing God’s Design,” co-authored with trauma researcher Jennifer Bauwens, seeks to equip pastors, families and churches to address questions surrounding gender identity through what the authors describe as biblical and psychological frameworks.
During the interview, Heyer spoke in direct and often very personal terms. He described childhood experiences that he believes shaped his later struggles with identity, beginning with his grandmother dressing him in girls’ clothing as a small child.
“Grandma cross-dressed me,” he said. “She caused the psychological emotional abuse. Then my dad physically abused me because of the dress, then because of the dress my uncle sexually molested me. And so all that before I was 10 years old.”
“Trying to escape some pain”
Heyer said those experiences left him deeply confused about himself for years. Looking back, he believes many people who identify as transgender are responding to unresolved wounds rather than pursuing a genuine change of sex.
“People who take on this identity called transgenderism are not trying to become a female or male,” he said. “They’re trying to escape some pain or discomfort or confusion they have.”
He linked his own eventual decision to undergo surgery to earlier trauma and fear.
“I’m sure this affected me in my later years, cutting off body parts so that no one would ever sexually molest me,” he said. “It was a protection against sexual molestation.”
Heyer stressed the importance of language, arguing that churches often adopt terminology that, in his view, reinforces confusion rather than helps people address underlying causes.
He objected strongly to the term “gender dysphoria,” describing it as a symptom rather than a diagnosis.
“If somebody has the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, then you need to change that to, ‘No, that’s a symptom of something down here that we need to work on,’” he said. “We need to find out what it is.”
The question he believes churches and counselors should ask people wrestling with identity issues is: “What caused you to not like who you are?”
“That’s the bottom line to this whole thing,” he said.
Churches facing fear and uncertainty
Heyer also addressed the uncertainty many churches feel when someone identifying as transgender begins attending services. He said congregations should avoid panic or hostility, but he also urged churches to respond intentionally rather than passively.
“The church needs to become educated in what language is appropriate,” he said. “Pastors and others really don’t know how to deal with it.”
Rather than leaving individuals isolated, he suggested churches appoint a trusted person — an elder, pastor or deacon — to walk alongside someone struggling with gender identity.
“You assign someone in the church to walk with that person,” he said. “Somebody that the church can fully trust and who’s got expertise in this.”
Heyer specifically suggested that individuals should write regular letters describing their struggles and spiritual journey and asking for prayer.
“Have that individual who’s struggling write a prayer letter every week,” he said. “Then they start praying for them.”
He described the process as a way of drawing people into community and spiritual accountability over time.
“And then over a period of time, can we expand this out to a larger group?” he said. “Can we have a home group that does this?”
For Heyer, willingness to engage in prayer is a significant indicator of whether someone is genuinely open to change.
“If you ask the person, ‘Can you write a prayer letter?’ and they say, ‘No, I’m not going to write a prayer letter,’ then you automatically tell them, ‘This is not a place we can help you,’” he said.
He believes it is important for the church to distinguish between what he described as a compliant posture toward faith and a defiant one.
“There’s the word compliant toward the fact that they believe Jesus Christ can restore their life and they’ll pray about it,” he said, contrasting it with “defiant where they don’t believe prayer works.”
Patience, prayer and long recovery
Heyer cautioned churches against expecting rapid transformation.
While he said some individuals may quickly rethink their identity after beginning deeper self-reflection, he described restoration as a process that often takes years.
“The expectation is maybe two or three years,” he said. “If they’ve struggled for 10 years, it might take them five years. If they struggled for 20, it might take them 10.”
Patience, he said, becomes essential.
“You have to be very patient,” he said. “This is where prayer really comes in handy and having them surrounded by people.”
At the same time, Heyer described moments where a single conversation triggered sudden reconsideration. “I’ve actually had people, when I’ve had that conversation, who struggled for many years,” he said. “Within a week, they’ve restored their life. They go, ‘This was nuts!’”
Still, he acknowledged that such cases are unusual. “Not everybody’s that healthy,” he said. “You can’t hit that all the time.”
What about pronouns?
Asked about how believers should deal with the sensitive issue of first names and pronouns, Heyer advised Christians not to use requested pronouns tied to a transgender identity. Instead, he suggested avoiding pronouns altogether or using surnames when necessary.
“When they say, ‘Use the pronouns,’ I can talk to you for three hours and never use a pronoun,” he said. “If they’re insisting on using the first name, then I insist on using their last name.”
He emphasized that, in his view, asking thoughtful questions can be more compassionate than affirming identity claims.
“The most caring, most wonderful thing you can do is get them to start having self-reflection,” he said.
Concerns about schools and culture
The conversation also touched on concerns many Christian parents face as discussions surrounding gender identity increasingly appear in schools and childhood environments in ways that previous generations did not experience.
Heyer expressed alarm about what children encounter in educational settings and said many parents feel they have little influence over those environments.
“Parents can’t control what goes on in school,” he said. “That’s the part that’s scary.”
He argued that schools often shape children more powerfully than family conversations once students enter those environments daily, and trans activists have been planting seeds in children’s minds.
“When they get to school, it’s their environment that they’re in that’s going to have bigger influence over their life,” he said.
Although he pointed to homeschooling or attending Christian schools as possible responses, he also acknowledged that many families around the world do not have that option.
The evidence has been there for decades
While the broader cultural debate surrounding gender identity has been developing for decades, Heyer emphasized that it has also been scientifically known for a long time that affirming someone’s gender identity and letting them transition is not a solution.
He referenced Dr. Charles Ihlenfeld, an endocrinologist and homosexual activist who, according to Heyer, administered hormone treatments to hundreds of men before later opposing gender transition procedures.
“He came out against it in 1979!” Heyer said. “He said, ‘I’ve worked with 500 of them, I’ve talked to them and I found too much unhappiness and too many have committed suicide.’”
Heyer also pointed to earlier media reporting questioning the effectiveness of sex-change surgeries. “We have all these data points,” he said. “It’s like the guy driving through a stop sign and finally he hits another car and crashes.”
Heyer argues it is important for churches to be informed in order not to be misled by mainstream narratives and trends that ignore the science and facts that have existed for a long time.
‘They never changed their gender’
Despite the emotional complexity surrounding gender identity, Heyer said he believes churches should approach the issue with hope rather than fear. Instead of viewing transgender-identifying individuals primarily through political or cultural conflict, churches should recognize pain, trauma and spiritual struggle.
For Heyer, the church’s task is not to treat gender identity struggles as uniquely strange or untouchable, but as part of the broader brokenness people experience in life.
“We work with people whose parents have died, people who’ve lost limbs, people who have cancer,” he said. “This is just something tragic that’s happened.”
“The most critical view of hope is that they never actually changed their gender,” he said. “We need to bring them back to how God created them.”
He emphasized that it is a scientific fact that men cannot become women and women cannot become men. Therefore, a person who underwent surgery has not in actuality changed their gender.
“No, they didn’t change them at the clinic,” Heyer said. “They don’t know how to do it. They’re not God.”
That perspective, he said, changes how congregations respond.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Australian Christian survey finds strong support for climate action]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/australian-christian-survey-finds-strong-support-for-climate-action</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/australian-christian-survey-finds-strong-support-for-climate-action</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/45/4511.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Australian Christians who participated in a new climate survey by NCLS Research and Common Grace reported taking practical steps such as reducing energy use and installing rooftop solar panels as part of efforts to address climate change.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Unsplash / David Clode ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Australian Christians who participated in a new climate survey by NCLS Research and Common Grace reported taking practical steps such as reducing energy use and installing rooftop solar panels as part of efforts to address climate change. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[A new survey released by Australian research organization NCLS Research and Christian advocacy movement Common Grace found that many Australian Christians who participated expressed concern about climate change and reported already taking practical steps to address it, including reducing household energy use, installing solar panels and engaging in civic advocacy.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
A new survey released by Australian research organization NCLS Research and Christian advocacy movement Common Grace found that many Australian Christians who participated expressed concern about climate change and reported already taking practical steps to address it, including reducing household energy use, installing solar panels and engaging in civic advocacy.
The Climate Action Survey of Australian Christians, based on responses from more than 1,100 participants in late 2025, examined attitudes toward climate change, support for various climate-related policies and technologies, and the kinds of actions Christians say they are taking individually and through churches.
The findings offer a snapshot of climate engagement among a segment of Australian Christians at a time when environmental issues continue to shape political, economic and theological debates across many churches globally.
Researchers cautioned that the survey was not representative of the broader Australian church population. According to the report, participants disproportionately consisted of highly educated Christians and were largely from Protestant backgrounds.
Even so, the report said the data provides insight into what encourages or discourages climate-related engagement among churchgoers already interested in the issue.
According to the survey, nearly all respondents reported taking some form of consumer action connected to climate concerns. About nine in 10 said they had reduced energy use or undertaken measures such as installing solar power. Around seven in 10 reported participating in civic actions including voting, advocacy or discussing climate issues with family and friends.
The study also explored support for climate-related policy approaches and what respondents viewed as barriers to further action.
In comments released alongside the report, Common Grace National Director Gershon Nimbalker said many Christians involved in climate discussions are looking for practical ways to respond.
“This research confirms what we’re seeing across the Church and in our movement as well — many Christians care deeply about God’s creation and want to live out Jesus’ love in ways that ensure that their children, their communities and our global neighbours flourish,” Nimbalker said.
He added that many Christians are asking whether their actions can make a difference and whether others in the church share similar concerns.
Common Grace, which describes itself as a Christian movement focused on social justice issues, used the release of the report to renew its support for a proposed 25% levy on Australian gas exports. The organization said such a policy could help address cost-of-living pressures and fund public services, though the survey itself focused more broadly on attitudes and participation related to climate action.
The approximately 40-question survey covered demographics, beliefs about climate change, support for climate solutions, personal and church-based actions, and perceived barriers preventing greater involvement.
The report forms part of broader discussions within Australian churches over environmental stewardship, fossil fuels and renewable energy. Christian groups in Australia, as in other countries, remain divided on how climate policy should intersect with theology, economics and public policy.
NCLS Research, known for its long-running National Church Life Survey, describes itself as a research organization focused on church life, spirituality and community wellbeing. The organization said the climate survey was commissioned to help build a research base for understanding Christian engagement with climate-related issues in Australia.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[AI analysis ranks Christianity as most rational worldview, apologist says]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-analysis-ranks-christianity-as-most-rational-worldview-apologist-says</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-analysis-ranks-christianity-as-most-rational-worldview-apologist-says</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/10/1012.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[ A third of Christian adults believe Artificial Intelligence is better or equal to humans at developing Bible-based sermons ]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Amrulqays Maarof from Pixabay ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 07:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[A recent opinion column published in The Christian Post argues that an artificial intelligence analysis of major world religions identified Christianity as the most rational belief system, a claim the author says supports longstanding Christian apologetic arguments.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
A recent opinion column published in The Christian Post argues that an artificial intelligence analysis of major world religions identified Christianity as the most rational belief system, a claim the author says supports longstanding Christian apologetic arguments.
In the piece, Jay Atkins, a government affairs attorney and Christian apologist, writes that he asked an unnamed AI engine to evaluate five major worldviews — atheism, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism and Christianity — based on their ability to explain reality and the number of assumptions required. According to Atkins, the AI concluded that Christianity “offers the most reasonable overall explanation of reality with the fewest leaps of faith.”
Atkins said he framed the inquiry around six core questions, including the origin of the universe, the nature of consciousness, the existence of moral truth and whether life has meaning or purpose. He also asked the AI to assess the historical reliability of each belief system’s claims.
Summarizing the reported findings, Atkins wrote that atheism ranked highly for simplicity but struggled to account for questions such as why the universe exists or how consciousness and moral obligation arise. He said Buddhism and Hinduism offered practical or expansive frameworks but relied on metaphysical claims that are difficult to verify, while Islam, in his account, faced challenges related to historical assertions about revelation.
By contrast, Atkins argued that Christianity provides a comprehensive explanation of reality while concentrating its evidentiary claims, particularly on the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. He wrote that this combination of explanatory scope and limited assumptions made it, in the AI’s assessment, the most rational worldview among those evaluated.
In his column, he also addresses the relationship between Christianity and science, arguing that Christian belief is compatible with scientific discoveries such as the Big Bang and the assumption of an ordered, intelligible universe. Atkins wrote that these ideas align with the biblical claim that God created the universe and with the historical development of scientific inquiry in a Christian intellectual context.
Atkins emphasized that the AI exercise does not prove the truth of Christianity, describing faith as requiring personal reflection rather than algorithmic validation. However, he argued that the outcome demonstrates Christianity is not inherently opposed to reason and may be supported by logical analysis.
The article also reflects on the role of artificial intelligence in religious discussion, suggesting that AI can serve as a tool for evaluating competing claims without replacing personal belief or spiritual conviction. Atkins wrote that such technology may help individuals consider which worldviews are most coherent, while acknowledging that faith ultimately extend beyond data-driven conclusions.
“AI is not going to answer the big questions for us, but it might help us see which answers make the most sense. For some skeptics, that might be a lifeline. And for that, we should be thankful,” he says.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Korea bioethics forum warns abortion becoming profit-driven industry]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/korea-bioethics-forum-warns-abortion-becoming-profit-driven-industry</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/korea-bioethics-forum-warns-abortion-becoming-profit-driven-industry</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/44/4441.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Dr. Jang Ji-young, secretary general of the Seongsan Institute for Bioethics, presents on the commercialization of abortion during the institute’s April colloquium in Seoul on April 11, outlining concerns over the growing role of pharmaceutical and distri]]></media:title>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Dr. Jang Ji-young, secretary general of the Seongsan Institute for Bioethics, presents on the commercialization of abortion during the institute’s April colloquium in Seoul on April 11, outlining concerns over the growing role of pharmaceutical and distribution networks in medication abortion. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Abortion in South Korea is increasingly being shaped by commercial forces and global pharmaceutical interests, according to a presentation at an April colloquium hosted by a Seoul-based bioethics institute, which warned that the growing use of medication abortion reflects a broader shift from a medical and ethical issue to a profit-driven industry.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Abortion in South Korea is increasingly being shaped by commercial forces and global pharmaceutical interests, according to a presentation at an April colloquium hosted by a Seoul-based bioethics institute, which warned that the growing use of medication abortion reflects a broader shift from a medical and ethical issue to a profit-driven industry.
The April colloquium of the Seongsan Institute for Bioethics, held April 11 at Yongsan Station in Seoul, featured Dr. Jang Ji-young, the institute’s secretary general and a physician at Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital. Speaking on “How does abortion become an industry? The U.S. case and legislative tasks for Korea,” Jang argued that abortion—particularly medication abortion—has evolved into a complex economic system involving pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors and policy advocates.
“Abortion was once a matter of personal belief, choice and bioethics,” Jang said. “Now it has become a composite economic structure combining public funding and commercial profit.”
Jang described a multi-layered industry in which large abortion service providers expand nationwide through chain models to achieve economies of scale, while pharmaceutical companies and distributors maximize profits through telemedicine and mail-order systems. She added that policy lobbying groups promote deregulation under a “rights framework,” further enabling the expansion of the sector.
The shift toward medication abortion, she said, has been central to this transformation. In the United States, 63% of abortions are now carried out using medication rather than surgery, a change that reduces fixed costs and allows for broader distribution through remote prescriptions and postal delivery.
“This bypasses time and space constraints and minimizes labor costs, leading to maximized corporate profits,” Jang said. “It is not simply about increasing patient convenience, but a deliberate industrial choice to establish a business model capable of unlimited expansion.”
Jang pointed to regulatory changes in the United States—such as expanded eligibility for abortion drugs in 2016, the approval of telemedicine prescriptions and mail delivery in 2021, and the inclusion of large pharmacy chains in 2023—as key drivers of rapid market growth. The global medication abortion market, she said, is estimated at $4.4 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $8 billion by 2035.
She argued that the industry’s profitability is driven by significant disparities between production costs and consumer prices. While manufacturing costs for abortion drugs are estimated at $1 to $4, supply prices to medical providers range from $75 to $100, and patients may be charged more than $500.
“Medication abortion has become a stable pharmaceutical market that realizes a massive margin structure,” Jang said, adding that companies benefit financially while avoiding responsibility for post-treatment outcomes.
“Although it is justified through the public discourse of ‘women’s rights,’ in reality it disperses medical responsibility and shifts risk onto women,” she said. “Complications such as incomplete abortion or hemorrhage are borne entirely by the individual, while the public health system absorbs the social costs.”
Jang challenged widely cited claims that medication abortion is significantly safer than childbirth, arguing that such conclusions rely on flawed comparisons and incomplete data. She said that complication rates reported by U.S. regulators—often cited as below 0.5%—are based on voluntary reporting, while analyses of insurance claims data show rates as high as 10.9%.
“In the United Kingdom, official figures reported only a few hundred complications, but freedom of information requests revealed more than 11,000 cases,” she said. “The claim that medication abortion is safer than full-term childbirth is only possible due to systematic omissions in data.”
Turning to South Korea, Jang said the country remains in a prolonged legislative vacuum following the Constitutional Court’s 2019 ruling that found the country’s abortion law unconstitutional. In the absence of updated legislation, she said, abortion services have become increasingly commercialized, with clinics openly advertising procedures and pricing.
She cited examples of advertisements promoting same-day abortion procedures up to six weeks of pregnancy for about 500,000 won ($370), as well as claims that even late-term abortions cannot be prosecuted under current legal conditions.
Jang also highlighted the role of pharmaceutical companies preparing to enter the Korean market. She said Hyundai Pharmaceutical secured exclusive domestic rights in 2020 to distribute the abortion drug Mifegymiso through an agreement with U.K.-based Linepharma International. The company already holds a dominant share of the emergency contraceptive market in South Korea and has built extensive distribution networks.
“If legalized, an immediate monopoly market entry structure will be completed,” she said, adding that companies have already identified abortion drugs as a “new core growth driver” and are building infrastructure ahead of regulatory approval.
Jang warned that introducing medication abortion without clear legal and ethical frameworks could accelerate the commercialization of medicine, weaken professional standards and shift risks onto individuals.
“The pharmaceutical market is moving preemptively without waiting for policy,” she said. “If introduced under these conditions, public health safeguards could be dismantled, with costs ultimately borne by women and the public healthcare system.”
She described developments in the United States as a cautionary example for South Korea, urging lawmakers to establish what she called “three principles of respect for life”: legal protection of life, safeguards against medical commercialization and protection of professional ethics and conscience.
Jang also addressed ongoing legislative discussions, saying “abortion policy must not become a growth strategy for a specific industry. The most urgent national task is to establish firm legislation that ensures clear accountability, data transparency, and prioritizes both life and women’s safety.”
She further called for revisions to South Korea’s Maternal and Child Health Act to explicitly include the fetus as a protected subject, remove provisions permitting abortion and strengthen support systems such as delivery infrastructure and intensive care for high-risk pregnancies.
“No legislation that harms life, including the introduction of medication abortion, should be included in the Maternal and Child Health Act,” she said.
This report is based on original reporting by Christian Today Korea.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Finnish study adds to growing scrutiny of ‘gender affirming care’ treatments, echoing Cass Review concerns]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/finnish-study-adds-to-growing-scrutiny-of-gender-affirming-care-treatments-echoing-cass-review-concerns</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/finnish-study-adds-to-growing-scrutiny-of-gender-affirming-care-treatments-echoing-cass-review-concerns</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/44/4440.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[A large-scale Finnish study tracking adolescents referred for gender identity services found persistently high rates of mental health challenges, underscoring the need for comprehensive psychological care alongside any clinical interventions.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Unsplash / Priscilla Du Preez ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ A large-scale Finnish study tracking adolescents referred for gender identity services found persistently high rates of mental health challenges, underscoring the need for comprehensive psychological care alongside any clinical interventions. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 02:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[A major new study from Finland has found that adolescents referred for gender identity treatment continue to experience significantly elevated mental health challenges over time, adding to a growing body of research and clinical concern about current approaches to treating gender dysphoria in minors.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
A major new study from Finland has found that adolescents referred for gender identity treatment continue to experience significantly elevated mental health challenges over time, adding to a growing body of research and clinical concern about current approaches to treating gender dysphoria in minors.
The study, published in Acta Paediatrica, analyzed national registry data spanning 1996 to 2019 and tracked approximately 2,100 young people referred to specialized gender identity services. Researchers found that nearly half—about 46%—had already received psychiatric care before referral, rising to nearly 62% within two years afterward.
Compared to their peers, adolescents in the study showed markedly higher levels of psychiatric need both before and after referral. After adjusting for prior treatment, girls were about three times more likely to require additional psychiatric care, while boys were about five times more likely.
The findings reinforce concerns raised in earlier reporting by Christian Daily International on international reviews and medical debates surrounding youth gender treatment, including the landmark Cass Review in the United Kingdom.
That review, commissioned by the National Health Service, concluded that the evidence base supporting medical interventions such as puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors remains limited and uncertain. It also raised concerns about clinical pathways that move too quickly toward medicalization without sufficiently addressing underlying psychological factors.
The Finnish study similarly found that adolescents referred for gender identity services had “significantly higher psychiatric morbidity” prior to treatment—suggesting that gender-related distress often coexists with other mental health conditions. Researchers emphasized the need for thorough psychological assessment and ongoing mental health care, noting that “psychiatric needs must be adequately met.”
Christian Daily International previously reported that pediatricians and medical experts in several countries have warned against what they describe as a “rushed” approach to medical transition for minors. Some clinicians have called for stricter safeguards or a pause on certain interventions, particularly irreversible procedures, citing concerns about long-term outcomes and the quality of supporting evidence.
The Finnish data provides rare long-term insight due to the country’s comprehensive national health system, which allows researchers to track outcomes over decades. It found that psychiatric care needs increased during follow-up even among those who underwent medical interventions, with rates rising sharply in both male-to-female and female-to-male treatment groups.
These findings align with broader international discussions about the natural course of gender dysphoria in youth. Some longitudinal studies have suggested that a significant proportion of children experiencing gender-related distress do not continue to identify as transgender into adulthood, particularly when symptoms emerge before adolescence.
At the same time, recent developments in the United Kingdom—including a closely watched clinical trial involving puberty blockers—have drawn criticism from both evangelical groups and some LGBT advocates who highlighted the long-term harm of medical interventions.
While the Finnish researchers did not advocate for specific policy changes, their study adds weight to calls for a more cautious and holistic approach. By highlighting persistent mental health challenges and the complexity of underlying conditions, the findings contribute to a growing reassessment of the assumption that so-called “gender-affirming care” leads to improved psychological outcomes.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Jordanian animation video brings practical help to families facing war anxiety]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/jordanian-animation-video-brings-practical-help-to-families-facing-war-anxiety</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/jordanian-animation-video-brings-practical-help-to-families-facing-war-anxiety</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Daoud Kuttab]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/43/4379.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[A scene from an animated video by Jordan’s Digitales Media shows a family using breathing exercises to manage stress during a missile alert.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Courtesy of Digitales Media ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ A scene from an animated video by Jordan’s Digitales Media shows a family using breathing exercises to manage stress during a missile alert. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 03:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[As sirens warning of possible missile strikes echo across parts of the Middle East, a Jordanian animation company has released a short video aimed at helping families cope with the emotional strain of the ongoing conflict involving Iran.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
As sirens warning of possible missile strikes echo across parts of the Middle East, a Jordanian animation company has released a short video aimed at helping families cope with the emotional strain of the ongoing conflict involving Iran.
Digitales Media, based in Amman, developed the five-minute animated episode to offer practical ways—especially for children—to deal with tension and anxiety linked to war conditions. The initiative comes as the conflict’s impact extends beyond physical destruction and travel disruptions, affecting daily life and mental well-being across the region.
The episode opens with the now-familiar sound of the siren blasting through an apartment neighborhood in Amman while the streets are deserted. The production is part of a long-running YouTube series, Our Family Life, that has captured the imagination of families around the region.
Cynthia Madanat-Sharaiha, creative director and co-owner of Digitales Media, explains that her team was looking for ways to help families during the war. “We wanted to find a practical way for people in general, and children in particular, to deal with tensions emanating from the war,” she told Christian Daily International.
Shadi Sharaiha, the program’s executive producer, told CDI that this particular episode of “Our Family Life” was a deliberate attempt to translate evidence-based coping techniques into something families can actually use at home—in moments of tension and after the sirens fade.
“The entire Middle East region has been overwhelmed with flying missiles and 24-hour war news that has engulfed everyone. Our creative team worked around the clock to find practical solutions that can help families deal with trauma, not only during war but at any other time,” he said.
In the YouTube video, after hearing the siren, Abu Sanad’s family meets and reflects on their concerns. The mother presents breathing exercises and encourages her family to follow them. The company says they were careful to present evidence-based treatments in a visually attractive manner, with additional downloadable exercises provided at the end.
Issam Smeir, a Chicago-based trauma counselor and advisor to the content of the Digitales products, told CDI that the “Our Family Life” series is not merely entertaining but a creative show that helps parents teach their children how to engage with life’s challenges.
He said that “the dealing-with-stress episode” aims to help families regulate their nervous systems when war anxiety spills into daily life. “The wisdom comes from the mother, whose on-screen breathing exercises are not gimmicks but a gateway to resilience that can be learned without prior therapy and without leaving the living room,” he explained.
Smeir said that stress is a natural response to an unnatural situation. According to the mental health specialist, the breathing exercise helps “reset the nervous system back to normal.”
Digitales Media adopted a real-time approach, pairing a short film with downloadable exercises and a digital toolkit offering science-based methods to manage stress and trauma. The approach combines accessibility with methods commonly used in clinical trauma care, including breathing exercises and routines designed to create a sense of safety.
Yet in many Arab countries, where access to mental health services can be uneven, stigmatized, or disrupted by displacement—these tools risk remaining abstract unless they are rendered tangible and culturally resonant.
Digitales, the producer of the award-winning feature film “Saleem,” is a leading media organization that creates content addressing emotional issues. It tells the story of a curious and adventurous nine-year-old who moves to a new town with his family after losing his father.
The company’s co-directors, Shadi and Cynthia Sharaiha, received the King Abdullah II Award of Excellence for the film and the production team was also visited by Crown Prince Hussein bin Abdullah and Princess Rajwa during production.
Digitales also produces a creative digital mental health and psychosocial support tool, “Amal for Children,” that combines animation and storytelling with evidence-based therapy modalities to help reduce the intensity and frequency of PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms in children navigating trauma. Their video content has been used by refugee groups in Egypt and has been translated for use in other regions of the world.Church leaders have said the production enables them to better support children in difficult situations as they cope with stress and trauma.
When content is crafted in local dialects and framed within familiar family dynamics, it becomes less intimidating and more credible, producers say. The Jordanian film’s setting in Amman, its emphasis on family participation and its clear, actionable guidance exemplify how healing tools can be culturally anchored and practically useful.
With the conflict reaching countries unaccustomed to such threats, the sound of sirens and the need to seek shelter have contributed to rising stress levels among families.
The video presents a practical sequence from awareness to action, equipping families with tools they can use in daily life, whether at home, in school or during emergencies.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[AI’s Scripture problem: misquotes range from 15% to 60%, says YouVersion CEO]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ais-scripture-problem-misquotes-range-from-15-to-60-says-youversion-ceo</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ais-scripture-problem-misquotes-range-from-15-to-60-says-youversion-ceo</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent Matinde]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/42/4295.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[YouVersion founder and CEO Bobby Gruenewald]]></media:title>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ YouVersion founder and CEO Bobby Gruenewald said while some errors may involve commas or minor wording shifts, in Bible translation every word and punctuation is meaningful to Scripture translation ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 07:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[YouVersion founder and CEO Bobby Gruenewald says artificial intelligence holds enormous promise. But when it comes to answering questions about God and Scripture, he believes the technology is not yet ready.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
YouVersion founder and CEO Bobby Gruenewald says artificial intelligence holds enormous promise. But when it comes to answering questions about God and Scripture, he believes the technology is not yet ready.
As the head of the digital Bible platform that now reports more than 1 billion downloads across its family of apps worldwide, Gruenewald has a vantage point as churches, pastors and believers increasingly turn to AI chatbots for spiritual answers. 
“If we ever do (fully adapt AI), it will be because we feel very confident that it can be done safely and be done with a level of accuracy and integrity,” Gruenewald said in an interview with Christian Daily International when asked whether YouVersion would step into open-ended AI question-and-answer chat features.
YouVersion offers Scripture in hundreds of languages and has become one of the most widely used Bible tools globally. 
Gruenewald, who was in Nairobi to open YouVersion regional hub that will facilitate localized digital content, described himself as an early AI adopter. YouVersion already uses AI internally to accelerate coding and improve workflow behind the scenes. But the organization has chosen not to launch a public-facing chatbot that answers theological questions. The reason, he said, is accuracy.
“The best model with the best performance, with the most popular versions of the Bible that are most indexed, misquotes Scripture at least 15% of the time,” Gruenewald said. “Some of them as much as 60% of the time.”
While some errors may involve commas or minor wording shifts, he said even small changes matter. “For Bible translation, every word and punctuation is meaningful to Scripture translation,” he said.
Large language models train on vast portions of the internet. That breadth makes them powerful but also unpredictable. Gruenewald said open-ended chat systems can generate responses that organizations would not “be proud of” because users may not have memorized Scripture, they might not recognize when a verse is misquoted or subtly altered.
His caution reflects a broader debate unfolding across the Christian world.
Some Christian leaders and scholars have warned that AI tools can present flawed or biased interpretations of Scripture. In a 2023 analysis, Christianity Today explored how AI systems can produce confident yet inaccurate theological explanations and urged discernment when using such tools for Bible study. The publication noted that chatbots can blend correct citations with subtle interpretive errors, creating an illusion of authority.
At the same time, churches are experimenting. Axios reported in 2025 that congregations in the United States have begun using AI to help draft sermons, create devotional materials and power prayer apps. Some platforms allow users to “chat” with biblical characters or ask questions about faith. While some pastors see these tools as innovative outreach methods, others question whether they risk trivializing sacred texts or outsourcing spiritual formation to algorithms.
Improving models
Gruenewald’s position sits between rejection and embrace. He said YouVersion wants to be “a part of the solution and a part of the help.” He added that the organization has privately challenged AI developers to improve how models handle Scripture. If models could consistently quote the Bible accurately, he said, YouVersion would work to help them gain access to reliable biblical texts.
Faith-based technology firms are also exploring guardrails. Reuters reported in 2025 that Gloo, a faith-oriented technology company, launched efforts to evaluate AI systems based on values important to Christian communities. The goal is to create standards that measure how AI tools align with principles such as human flourishing and theological integrity. Supporters argue that such initiatives could help shape safer faith-based AI applications rather than leaving development entirely to general-purpose models.
For many ministry leaders, AI already serves practical roles. It can analyze data, draft communications and assist with administrative work. Those use cases free pastors to spend more time in direct ministry. AI can also help scholars search biblical texts quickly, compare translations and identify linguistic patterns.
But Gruenewald draws a line at spiritual authority.
“When it comes to answering life’s most important questions and trying to give direction from God’s Word, we need it to be better in order to rely on it,” he said.
His warning comes as younger generations increasingly turn to chatbots before they turn to clergy. Surveys show that many users treat AI tools as neutral sources of information. Yet models generate responses based on probabilities, not doctrine or spiritual discernment.
The question facing ministries is not whether AI will influence faith engagement. It already does. The question is how.
For YouVersion, scale increases responsibility. With more than 1 billion downloads worldwide, the app reaches believers in nearly every region. Its features include reading plans, audio Bibles and verse-sharing tools. Many churches integrate the app into discipleship programs.
That global footprint means any AI-driven Scripture feature would affect millions of users. Gruenewald’s caution reflects the weight of that reality.
He encouraged individuals to know the Bible themselves and to seek guidance from trained pastors and leaders. Technology, he suggested, can assist but should not replace human discipleship or careful study.
The debate is unlikely to fade. As AI models improve, pressure will grow for faith platforms to integrate conversational features. Some Christian technologists believe specialized, Scripture-trained systems could eventually reach the accuracy standards Gruenewald describes.
The tension between innovation and integrity now defines the AI-and-faith conversation. Churches see the potential: wider reach, faster research, personalized engagement. They also see the risk: misquoted verses, theological drift and misplaced trust.
For Gruenewald, the calculus is simple. Speed and popularity do not outweigh fidelity. AI may shape the future of ministry. But when it comes to sacred text, he argues, precision must come first.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA['AI can generate sermons but cannot convey a life,' Korean pastors say at AI-era preaching conference]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-can-generate-sermons-but-cannot-convey-a-life-korean-pastors-say-at-ai-era-preaching-conference</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/ai-can-generate-sermons-but-cannot-convey-a-life-korean-pastors-say-at-ai-era-preaching-conference</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[CDI Staff]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/42/4210.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[Rev. Kim Da-wi delivers his presentation at the 2026 Pathway Preaching Conference.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Good Shepherd Church ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ Rev. Kim Da-wi delivers his presentation at the 2026 Pathway Preaching Conference. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                                                <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/42/4211.png">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[The 2026 Pathway Preaching Conference was held at Good Shepherd Church south of Seoul, Korea.]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Good Shepherd Church ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                        <media:description type="plain">
                                    <![CDATA[ The 2026 Pathway Preaching Conference was held at Good Shepherd Church south of Seoul, Korea. ]]>
                                </media:description>
                                                    </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 20:13:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence may be able to generate polished sermons, complete with structure, illustrations and theological analysis, but it cannot embody lived faith, suffering or spiritual encounter, speakers said at a Korean church conference examining the future of preaching in the AI era.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Artificial intelligence may be able to generate polished sermons, complete with structure, illustrations and theological analysis, but it cannot embody lived faith, suffering or spiritual encounter, speakers said at a Korean church conference examining the future of preaching in the AI era.
The “Pathway Preaching Conference,” held Feb. 26 at Good Shepherd Church in Seongnam, south of Seoul, brought together pastors, associate ministers and seminary students under the theme, “In the Age of AI, How Can Preaching Survive? (Is AI a Friend or a Foe?),” according to reporting by Christian Daily Korea.
Hosted by Good Shepherd Church, the event featured four sessions combining academic analysis and pastoral reflection. Participants said the debate over AI in ministry ultimately raises a deeper question: What is the essence of preaching?
Speakers acknowledged that AI tools are already capable of drafting sermons, generating illustrations, conducting biblical exegesis and even mimicking a preacher’s tone and style. But they cautioned against allowing technology to replace what they described as the incarnational and communal dimensions of Christian proclamation.
Rev. Kim Da-wi, senior pastor of Good Shepherd Church, framed the discussion around what he called “incarnational preaching,” arguing that the heart of Christian faith lies not in information transfer but in embodiment.
“If AI is used as a supplementary tool — such as for image generation or infographic production — it can become a helpful ally,” Kim said. “But when it attempts to replace the spiritual encounter, embodiment and resonance that lie at the heart of preaching, it becomes a threat.”

Kim referenced theologian Michael Frost’s concept of the “age of excarnation,” describing a cultural shift in which people retreat behind screens and avoid physical presence. He likened this to a digital echo of early Christian Docetism, a belief rejected by the early church that denied the full humanity of Christ.
An AI-generated sermon, Kim said, may be grammatically precise and theologically coherent, but it lacks lived experience. “Unless it contains real suffering, wounds and tears, it has an inherent limitation,” he said.
He proposed what he termed a “3E holistic cyclical preaching model”: Encounter with God, Embodiment of the Word in the preacher’s life, and Echo — resonance in the congregation through the work of the Holy Spirit. In the AI era, he added, preaching may require a recovery of what he described as “slow spirituality” and “analog spirituality.”
At the same time, Kim suggested that AI could serve as a memory aid rather than a replacement for the preacher. By compiling devotional journals, testimonies and past sermons into a digital database, ministers could use AI as a “second brain” to revisit and reflect on their spiritual journeys. “The preacher is one who embraces souls beyond data,” he said.
Rev. Lee Jung-gyu of Sigwang Church focused on the communal role of the preacher. While acknowledging that AI can now construct doctrinal sermons and detailed exegesis, he argued that preaching is more than message production.
“If we define the preacher as one who leads the story at the center of the community, there is clearly a realm AI cannot replace,” Lee said. “AI can generate a message, but it cannot say it has actually experienced that message.”
Lee emphasized the importance of ethos — the preacher’s history and character — in shaping how sermons are received. Congregants, he said, experience not only the content of a sermon but also the life of the preacher who proclaims it.
“AI can provide information,” he said, “but it cannot share with the community an experience it has lived.”
Other speakers addressed the theological and practical boundaries of AI use in preaching. Prof. Shin Sung-wook of Asia United Theological University examined the issue from a homiletical perspective, outlining both the possibilities and responsibilities involved in adopting AI tools. Rev. Choi Byung-rak of Gangnam Central Baptist Church highlighted the power of testimony and human stories rooted in personal experience — elements he said cannot be replicated by machines.
Throughout the conference, participants described AI as neither inherently friend nor foe, but as a tool requiring discernment. The central concern, speakers agreed, is preserving preaching as an event grounded in lived faith, communal formation and spiritual encounter — dimensions they said no algorithm can fully reproduce.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
                                                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Yale academics explore link between faith and psychiatry]]></title>
                <link>https://www.christiandaily.com/news/yale-academics-explore-link-between-faith-and-psychiatry</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.christiandaily.com/news/yale-academics-explore-link-between-faith-and-psychiatry</guid>
                                                            <dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Eyte]]></dc:creator>
                                                                                                                            <media:content  url="https://www.christiandaily.com/media/original/img/0/41/4179.jpg">
                            <media:title><![CDATA[prayer]]></media:title>
                                                            <media:credit role="author" scheme="urn:ebu">
                                    <![CDATA[ Photo by Ben White / Unsplash ]]>
                                </media:credit>
                                                                                </media:content>
                                                                            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:05:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description><![CDATA[A working group established by Yale Divinity School for an 18-month project examined how to bridge the gap between faith and psychiatry. Bruce Gordon, the Titus Street Professor of Ecclesiastical History at the university, has led the group, fostering collaboration between theologians and medical professionals.]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
A working group established by Yale Divinity School for an 18-month project examined how to bridge the gap between faith and psychiatry.
Bruce Gordon, the Titus Street Professor of Ecclesiastical History at the university, has led the group, fostering collaboration between theologians and medical professionals.
The initiative seeks to address the “longstanding mistrust” between the two fields, particularly within Christian communities.
In a press release for Yale Divinity School on Feb. 11, correspondent Kim Lawton recalled how the idea came from a faculty meeting two years ago when representatives from the Yale medical school’s Department of Psychiatry gave a presentation about their field’s growing interest in spirituality.
“They were increasingly seeing patients who were speaking about spiritual experiences or religious convictions and commitments, and to put a fine point on it, they didn’t know what to do with this,” Gordon told Lawton. “They were realizing that spirituality, however you want to define it, is something that exists and has to be taken seriously.”
Topics explored by the working group include brain function, medication, psychedelics, end-of-life issues, and the nature of religious experiences. Discussions have addressed questions such as the difference between visions and hallucinations, the meaning of spiritual experience, and the role of transcendence in psychological health. The group has also examined the boundaries between medicine and religion, including how depression and other conditions are defined.
Key goals for the group, co-led by psychiatry professors Christopher Pittenger and Anna Yusim, with a focus on “person-centered medicine,” include developing shared language. This means helping psychiatrists understand spiritual experiences not as symptoms of illness but as core aspects of a patient’s identity.
Another goal is equipping ministry leaders by addressing the reality that many clergy feel ill-equipped to handle mental health crises such as depression, burnout, or suicidal ideation within their congregations.
The final goal is to destigmatize mental health in the church, challenging the misconception that spiritual faith exempts a person from clinical depression or bipolar disorder.
Gordon said he has personal experience of the longstanding mistrust between religion and psychiatry.
“There have been negative perceptions on both sides,” he said, citing a widespread “general hostility within psychiatry” toward many organized forms of religion.
“And equally within many churches, certainly in my own upbringing, psychiatry was seen as something that was for seriously damaged people,” he added.
Looking ahead, the group’s leaders want to “widen the conversation” by including more students, faculty members, and the general public. A public forum, conferences, and possibly a podcast are also planned.
The purpose is not primarily academic research but rather people from their respective fields describing what they do and finding how best to talk together, Gordon said.
“People just do not get a lot of exposure to these kinds of conversations,” he added.]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>